ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024
Increased reproductive tract infections among secondary school girls during the COVID-19 pandemic: associations with pandemic related stress, mental health, and domestic safety.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Kenya, like many countries, shuttered schools during COVID-19, with subsequent increases in poor mental health, sexual activity, and pregnancy. We sought to understand how the COVID-19 pandemic may mediate risk of reproductive tract infections. We hypothesized that greater COVID-19 related stress would mediate risk via mental health, feeling safe inside the home, and sexual exposure, given the pandemic mitigation-related impacts of school closures on these factors. Methods: We analyzed data from a cohort of 436 girls enrolled in secondary school in rural western Kenya. Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18- month study visits occurred April 2018 - December 2019 (pre-COVID), and 30-, 36-, and 48- month study visits occurred September 2020 - July 2022 (COVID period). At study visits, participants self-completed a survey for sociodemographics and sexual practices, and provided self-collected vaginal swabs for Bacterial vaginosis (BV) testing, with STI testing at annual visits. COVID-related stress was measured with a standardized scale and dichotomized at highest quartile. Mixed effects modeling quantified how BV and STI changed over time, and longitudinal mediation analysis quantified how the relationship between COVID-19 stress and increased BV was mediated. Findings: BV and STI prevalence increased from 12.1% and 10.7% pre-COVID to 24.5% and 18.1% during COVID, respectively. This equated to a 26% (95% CI 1.00 - 1.59) and 36% (95% CI 0.98 - 1.88) increased relative prevalence of BV and STIs, respectively, in the COVID-19 period compared to pre-COVID, adjusted for numerous sociodemographic and behavioral factors. Higher COVID-related stress was associated with elevated depressive symptoms and feeling less safe inside the home, which were each associated with increased likelihood of having a boyfriend. In longitudinal mediation analyses, the direct effect of COVID-related stress on BV was small and non-significant, indicating increased BV was due to the constellation of factors that were impacted during the COVID-pandemic. Conclusions: In this cohort of adolescent girls, BV and STIs increased following COVID-related school closures. These results highlight modifiable factors to help maintain sexual and reproductive health resiliency, such as anticipating and mitigating mental health impacts, domestic safety concerns, and maintaining sexual health services to prevent and treat reproductive tract infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.