ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Artificial Intelligence-Based Automated Interpretation of Images of Electrocardiograms: Development and Multinational Validation of ECG-GPT.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Professionalism vs. engagement: quality of SSc information on WeChat.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Timely and accurate assessment of electrocardiograms (ECGs) is crucial for diagnosing, triaging, and clinically managing patients. Current workflows rely on computerized ECG interpretation tools built into ECG signal acquisition systems, which use rule-based algorithms that are unreliable and frequently not available in low-resource settings. We developed and validated a format-independent vision encoder-decoder model - ECG-GPT - that can generate free-text, expert-level interpretations directly from 12-lead ECG images. Methods: Using 12-lead ECGs and their corresponding diagnosis statements collected at the Yale-New Haven Health System (YNHHS) between 2000 and 2022, we developed a vision-text transformer model to generate interpretation statements from images of ECGs. Using structured clinical assessment, semantic similarity, and conventional natural language generation metrics, we validated ECG-GPT across 7 geographically distinct health settings. These include (1) 3 large and diverse US health systems, (2) consecutive ECGs from a central reading system in Minas Gerais, Brazil, (3) the prospective cohort study, UK Biobank, (4) a Germany-based, publicly available repository, PTB-XL, and (5) a community hospital in Missouri. Results: Overall, 2.9 million ECGs were used for model development. The model performed well in clinical assessment across 26 extracted labels: for atrial fibrillation, sinus tachycardia, sinus bradycardia, premature atrial contractions, and premature ventricular contractions, AUROCs and AUPRCs ranged from 0.80-0.95 and 0.50-0.86, respectively. For left bundle branch block, right bundle branch block, first degree atrioventricular block, left anterior fascicular block, and left posterior fascicular block, AUROCs and AUPRCs ranged from 0.88-0.96 and 0.23-0.86, respectively. Across all 26 conditions, diagnostic accuracy ranged between 0.93-0.99. ECG-GPT identified the full context of the diagnosis statements with allied conditions. It had a median pairwise cosine similarity of 0.90 (IQR 0.83-0.97), significantly greater than the median baseline similarity of 0.73 (IQR 0.67-0.78, p<0.001). This separation between median pairwise and baseline similarity remained consistent across all 26 condition-specific subsets. The results were comparable across external validation sites. Conclusions: We developed and extensively validated a vision encoder-decoder model that generates expert-level interpretations from ECG images. This represents a scalable and accessible strategy for automated ECG analysis, especially in low-resource settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.