Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38405749›Full record

ArticleResearch square2024

Immunogenicity and efficacy of XBB.1.5 rS vaccine against EG.5.1 variant of SARS-CoV-2 in Syrian hamsters.

Jacco Boon, Nadia Soudani, Traci Bricker, Tamarand Darling, Kuljeet Seehra, Nita Patel, Mimi Guebre-Xabier, Gale Smith, Mehul Suthar, Ali Ellebedy and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jacco BoonWashington University School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0002-4700-8224
Nadia SoudaniWashington University School of Medicine.
Traci BrickerWashington University School of Medicine.
Tamarand DarlingWashington University School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0001-6640-9165
Kuljeet SeehraWashington University School of Medicine.
Nita PatelNovavax, Inc.
Mimi Guebre-XabierNovavax, Inc.
Gale SmithNovavax, Inc.
Mehul SutharEmory University School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0002-2686-8380
Ali EllebedyWashington University School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0002-6129-2532
Meredith Davis-GardnerEmory University School of Medicine.
Emory University · US

Funding

NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response: Universal Influenza Vaccine Research Activities75N93021C00016 · NIAID · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI WEBBY, RICHARD · 2021 to 2025
$91.4M
The Development and Evaluation of Pan-Coronavirus VaccinesP01AI168347 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Michael S Diamond · 2022 to 2026
$15.9M
Syrian hamsters as an animal model for influenza virus researchR01AI150678 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KAWAOKA, YOSHIHIRO · 2020 to 2023
$3.0M
Transmission of CoV-2 and the Impact of Spike Protein EvolutionR01AI169022 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Adrianus CM Boon · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
NIAID NIH HHS 75N93021C00016NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI168347NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI150678NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI169022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The continued emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants necessitates updating COVID-19 vaccines to match circulating strains. The immunogenicity and efficacy of these vaccines must be tested in pre-clinical animal models. In Syrian hamsters, we measured the humoral and cellular immune response after immunization with the nanoparticle recombinant Spike (S) protein-based COVID-19 vaccine (Novavax, Inc.). We also compared the efficacy of the updated monovalent XBB.1.5 variant vaccine to previous COVID-19 vaccines for the induction of XBB.1.5 and EG.5.1 neutralizing antibodies and protection against a challenge with the EG.5.1 variant of SARS-CoV-2. Immunization induced high levels of spike-specific serum IgG and IgA antibodies, S-specific IgG and IgA antibody secreting cells, and antigen specific CD4 + T-cells. The XBB.1.5 and XBB.1.16 vaccines, but not the Prototype vaccine, induced high levels of neutralizing antibodies against XBB.1.5 and EG.5.1 variants of SARS-CoV-2. Upon challenge with the Omicron EG.5.1 variant, the XBB.1.5 and XBB.1.16 vaccines reduced the virus load in the lungs, nasal turbinates, trachea and nasal washes. The bivalent vaccine continued to offer protection in the trachea and lungs, but protection was reduced in the upper airways. In contrast, the monovalent Prototype vaccine no longer offered good protection, and breakthrough infections were observed in all animals and tissues. Thus, the protein-based XBB.1.5 vaccine is immunogenic and can protect against the Omicron EG.5.1 variant in the Syrian hamster model.

Identifiers

PMID38405749
PMCPMC10889075
OpenAlexW4391681848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.