ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Using high-resolution functional MRI to differentiate impacts of strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia on evoked ocular dominance activity in humans.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We employed high-resolution functional MRI (fMRI) to distinguish the impacts of anisometropia and strabismus (the two most frequent causes of amblyopia) on the evoked ocular dominance (OD) response. Sixteen amblyopic participants (8 females), comprising 8 individuals with strabismus, 7 with anisometropia, 1 with deprivational amblyopia, along with 8 individuals with normal visual acuity (1 female), participated in this study for whom, we measured the difference between the response to stimulation of the two eyes, across early visual areas (V1-V4). In controls, as expected from the organization of OD columns, the evoked OD response formed a striped pattern that was mostly confined to V1. Compared to controls, the OD response in amblyopic participants formed larger fused patches that extended into downstream visual areas. Moreover, both anisometropic and strabismic participants showed stronger OD responses in V1, as well as in downstream visual areas V2-V4. Although this increase was most pronounced in V1, the correlation between the OD response level and the interocular visual acuity difference (measured behaviorally) was stronger in higher-level visual areas (V2-V4). Beyond these common effects, and despite similar densities of amblyopia between the anisometropic and strabismic participants, we found a greater increase in the size of V1 portion that responded preferentially to fellow eye stimulation in anisometropic compared to strabismic individuals. We also found a greater difference between the amplitudes of the response to binocular stimulation, in those regions that responded preferentially to the fellow vs. amblyopic eye, in anisometropic compared to strabismic subjects. In contrast, strabismic subjects demonstrated increased correlation between the OD responses evoked within V1 superficial and deep cortical depths, whereas anisometropic subjects did not. These results provide some of the first direct functional evidence for distinct impacts of strabismus and anisometropia on the mesoscale functional organization of the human visual system, thus extending what was inferred previously about amblyopia from animal models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.