ArticleCureus2024
Expansion of Mental Health Care in Japanese Obstetric Institutes.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current Status of Cooperation Between Obstetric Care Institutes and Psychiatrists in Japan.Cureus · 2024Article
- Postpartum care services and multi-disciplinary collaboration in Japan.The Journal of international medical research · 2024Review
- Postpartum Care Program in Japan.Frontiers in global women's health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (JAOG) has raised awareness of the usefulness of identifying pregnant women with mental health problems and supporting them through multi-professional collaboration. We evaluated the results of questionnaire surveys on mental health care conducted in all obstetric institutes that are members of the JAOG annually.
methodsBetween 2017 and 2023, we requested all obstetric institutes (n = 2,073-2,427) that are members of the JAOG to provide information concerning mental health care for pregnant and postpartum women about the situation in December every year from 2017. Here, we evaluated the results of the questionnaire surveys.
resultsDuring the study periods, 56.9-74.8% of the 2,073-2,427 institutes responded with valid information. The percentage of obstetric institutes screening for mental health problems during pregnancy and the postpartum period increased from 54.3% and 53.7% to 87.1% and 83.8%, respectively (p < 0.01). However, the proportion of obstetric institutes able to manage pregnant women with mental disorders did not change significantly during the study period.
conclusionThere has been progress in the active identification of women with mental health problems during pregnancy and the postpartum period. However, the proportion of institutes managing mental disorders has not changed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.