Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38405559›Full record

ArticleAnnals of maxillofacial surgery

Comparative Analysis of Peak Air Pressure and Oxygen Flow between Conventional and Modified Endotracheal Tube for Retromolar Intubation (PUNTUBE)-

Prashant A Punde

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of maxillofacial surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 64% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Prashant A PundeDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, Satara, Maharashtra, India.
Creative Commons · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In conventional practice for retromolar intubation, endotracheal tube (ET) is bent. This leads to compression of the inner diameter of the tube which in turn reduces airflow. Furthermore, conventionally ETs are stabilised in position using inflated tracheal cuff. Elastic sticky tapes around the exit pose hindrance for surgical procedures on the face. Surgical manipulation and maxillomandibular fixation may lead to compression, damage or accidental extubation of ET. We have developed a modified ET dedicated to retromolar intubation with innovative means for tube stabilisation to solve these problems. Materials and Methods: To study the efficacy of the tube, a comparative Results: The mean PEP was found to be 24.29 psi with standard deviation (SD) of 9.54 in sequentially bent conventional tube. This was found to be only 10.35 psi with SD of 3.22 in modified ET. Oxygen delivery was found to be 3.96 L/min in bent conventional tube, which was 5.22 L/min in modified tube. Both the findings were statistically significant. Discussion: Modified retromolar tube (PUNTUBE) has been found to be efficient in maintaining low PEP while delivering more oxygen as compared to bent conventional tube. Novel mode of tube stabilisation in the form of PUNSTAB is an easy and effective way of tube stabilisation.

Indexed as

Air pressureairwayairway extubationanaesthesiaendotracheal intubation

Identifiers

PMID38405559
PMCPMC10883227
OpenAlexW4390012010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.