ReviewACS omega2024
Decellularization and Their Significance for Tissue Regeneration in the Era of 3D Bioprinting.
Review in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing the Bio-Instructive Placental Extracellular Matrix: Structural Properties, Decellularization, and Applications in Regenerative Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Hydration as a governing state variable in the mechanical and electrical response of decellularized extracellular matrix materials.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Article
- Decellularized Rat Lung Extracellular Matrix as an In Vitro Platform for Canine Yolk Sac-Derived Endothelial Precursor Cells for Pulmonary Endothelium Reconstruction Studies.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advances in 3D Bioprinting: Materials, Processes, and Emerging Applications.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Advances in Decellularization of Fish Wastes for Extracellular Matrix Extraction in Sustainable Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Physical decellularization of fish skin utilizing electrical fields.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- Advances in 3D bioprinting for medical application: opportunities and challenges.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Review
- Three-Dimensional Bioprinting and Infertility-Related Female Reproductive System Diseases: A Review of Current and Future Applications.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2025Review
- Acellular Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds in Regenerative Medicine: Advances in Decellularization and Clinical Applications.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Engineering a GelMA-dECM-based 3D bioprinted liver fibrosis model: methotrexate-induced functional and molecular validation.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Greener Decellularization of Porcine Auricular Cartilage Using Supercritical Technology and Different Pretreatments for Application in Tissue Engineering.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Article
- Supercritical Carbon Dioxide-Processed Acellular Dermal Matrix Patch for Enhanced Wound Healing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Extracellular matrix in vascular homeostasis and disease.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025Review
- Enhanced Cell Proliferation, Migration, and Fibroblast Differentiation with Electrospun PCL-Zinc Scaffolds Coated with Fibroblast-Derived ECM.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of Voytik-Harbin Protocol in Fabrication of Ram's Testicular-Derived Hydrogel and Its Impact on MouseInternational journal of fertility & sterility · 2025Article
- Innovative bioinks for 3D bioprinting: Exploring technological potential and regulatory challenges.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional bioprinting is an emerging technology that has high potential application in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Increasing advancement and improvement in the decellularization process have led to an increase in the demand for using a decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) to fabricate tissue engineered products. Decellularization is the process of retaining the extracellular matrix (ECM) while the cellular components are completely removed to harvest the ECM for the regeneration of various tissues and across different sources. Post decellularization of tissues and organs, they act as natural biomaterials to provide the biochemical and structural support to establish cell communication. Selection of an effective method for decellularization is crucial, and various factors like tissue density, geometric organization, and ECM composition affect the regenerative potential which has an impact on the end product. The dECM is a versatile material which is added as an important ingredient to formulate the bioink component for constructing tissue and organs for various significant studies. Bioink consisting of dECM from various sources is used to generate tissue-specific bioink that is unique and to mimic different biometric microenvironments. At present, there are many different techniques applied for decellularization, and the process is not standardized and regulated due to broad application. This review aims to provide an overview of different decellularization procedures, and we also emphasize the different dECM-derived bioinks present in the current global market and the major clinical outcomes. We have also highlighted an overview of benefits and limitations of different decellularization methods and various characteristic validations of decellularization and dECM-derived bioinks.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.