Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38405479›Full record

ReviewACS omega2024

A Review on Recent Trends and Future Developments in Electrochemical Sensing.

Rimmy Singh, Ruchi Gupta, Deepak Bansal, Rachna Bhateria, Mona Sharma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rimmy SinghDepartment of Applied Science & Humanities, DPG Institute of Technology and Management, Gurugram 122004, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1972-8873
Ruchi GuptaSchool of Chemistry, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6456-8007
Deepak BansalJBM Group, Gurugram 122001, India.
Rachna BhateriaDepartment of Environmental Science, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak 124001, India.
Mona SharmaDepartment of Environmental Studies, Central University of Haryana, Mahendergarh 123031, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrochemical methods and devices have ignited prodigious interest for sensing and monitoring. The greatest challenge for science is far from meeting the expectations of consumers. Electrodes made of two-dimensional (2D) materials such as graphene, metal-organic frameworks, MXene, and transition metal dichalcogenides as well as alternative electrochemical sensing methods offer potential to improve selectivity, sensitivity, detection limit, and response time. Moreover, these advancements have accelerated the development of wearable and point-of-care electrochemical sensors, opening new possibilities and pathways for their applications. This Review presents a critical discussion of the recent developments and trends in electrochemical sensing.

Identifiers

PMID38405479
PMCPMC10882602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.