Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38405471›Full record

ReviewACS omega2024

Metal Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Production in Water Splitting.

Amir Kazemi, Faranak Manteghi, Zari Tehrani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Phase-Engineering and Interfacial Coupling in 3D Hierarchical WOSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Durable, Binder-Free MoOSmall methods · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. RSC advances · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Binder-Free Spinel CoMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Amir KazemiResearch Laboratory of Inorganic Chemistry and Environment, Department of Chemistry, Iran University of Science and Technology, 16846-13114 Tehran, Iran.
Faranak ManteghiResearch Laboratory of Inorganic Chemistry and Environment, Department of Chemistry, Iran University of Science and Technology, 16846-13114 Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2590-5063
Zari TehraniThe Future Manufacturing Research Institute, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, SA1 8EN Swansea, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5069-7921
Iran University of Science and Technology · IRSwansea University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rising demand for fossil fuels and the resulting pollution have raised environmental concerns about energy production. Undoubtedly, hydrogen is the best candidate for producing clean and sustainable energy now and in the future. Water splitting is a promising and efficient process for hydrogen production, where catalysts play a key role in the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). HER electrocatalysis can be well performed by Pt with a low overpotential close to zero and a Tafel slope of about 30 mV dec

Identifiers

PMID38405471
PMCPMC10882616
OpenAlexW4391329811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.