ArticleACS omega2024
Hydrophobicity-Based Force Field In Enzymes.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating the molecular mechanisms of the "Tianma-Gouteng" herb pair in treating Parkinson's disease: a bioinformatics approach and density functional theory with molecular dynamics simulations validation.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Enzymatic Conversion of Mixed Neem (ACS omega · 2025Article
- Chameleon sequences-Structural effects.PloS one · 2025Article
- Protein folding: Funnel model revised.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Domain swapping: a mathematical model for quantitative assessment of structural effects.FEBS open bio · 2024Article
- Mechanistic Insights into the Stimulatory Effect of Melanogenesis of 4-Methylcoumarin Derivatives in B16F10 Melanoma Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The biocatalysis process takes place with the participation of enzymes, which, depending on the reaction carried out, require, apart from the appropriate arrangement of catalytic residues, an appropriate external force field. It is generated by the protein body. The relatively small size of the part directly involved in the process itself is supported by the presence of an often complex structure of the protein body, the purpose of which is to provide an appropriate local force field, eliminating the influence of water. Very often, the large size of the enzyme is an expression of the complex form of this field. In this paper, a comparative analysis of arbitrarily selected enzymes, representatives of different enzyme classes, was carried out, focusing on the measurement of the diversity of the force field provided by a given protein. This analysis was based on the fuzzy oil drop model (FOD) and its modified version (FOD-M), which takes into account the participation of nonaqueous external factors in shaping the structure and thus the force field within the protein. The degree and type of ordering of the hydrophobicity distribution in the protein molecule is the result of the influence of the environment but also the supplier of the local environment for a given process, including the catalysis process in particular. Determining the share of a nonaqueous environment is important due to the ubiquity of polar water, whose participation in processes with high specificity requires control. It can be assumed that some enzymes in their composition have a permanently built-in part, the role of which is reduced to that of a permanent chaperone. It provides a specific external force field needed for the process. The proposed model, generalized to other types of proteins, may also provide a form of recording the environment model for the simulation of the in silico protein folding process, taking into account the impact of its differentiation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.