Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38405287›Full record

ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2024

An Organizational Model for Increasing Access to the Scholarly Literature.

Amber L Valentino, Jessica F Juanico, Ashley M Fuhrman, Aakshan Kaur Lidhar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amber L ValentinoTrumpet Behavioral Health, 390 Union Blvd., Suite 300, Lakewood, CO 80228 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7535-5277
Jessica F JuanicoDepartment of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS USA.
Ashley M FuhrmanTrumpet Behavioral Health, 390 Union Blvd., Suite 300, Lakewood, CO 80228 USA.
Aakshan Kaur LidharTrumpet Behavioral Health, 390 Union Blvd., Suite 300, Lakewood, CO 80228 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incorporating literature into practice can help behavior analysts provide better services and achieve better outcomes. In addition, behavior analysts have an ethical obligation to remain current with the scholarly literature and to use it to inform services. Despite the merits of maintaining regular contact with the published literature, barriers exist to doing so. In this tutorial, we present a system that was created for a human service agency to increase practitioner access to the scholarly literature. The system consisted of an electronic search request form, a literature team, and a liaison. We present 7 years of data including the frequency of use, topics of interest, and other noteworthy patterns of submitter responding. We discuss the value of this type of system, limitations of its design, and considerations for practitioners who may wish to implement a similar system in their agency. We discuss modifications that could be made to fit organizations of diverse sizes and with different resources, while presenting ideas for improvement and expansion of the system.

Indexed as

Evidence-based practiceInformation literacyLiterature accessResearch-to-practice gapScientist-practitioner model

Identifiers

PMID38405287
PMCPMC10890998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.