Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38405281›Full record

ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2024

Self-Control Training: A Scoping Review.

Kacey R Finch, Rebecca L Chalmé, Kathryn M Kestner, Brianna G Sarno

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kacey R FinchDepartment of Psychology, West Virginia University, 1124 Life Sciences Building, P.O. Box 6040, Morgantown, WV 26506-6040 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4454-1955
Rebecca L ChalméDepartment of Psychology, West Virginia University, 1124 Life Sciences Building, P.O. Box 6040, Morgantown, WV 26506-6040 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5561-1499
Kathryn M KestnerDepartment of Psychology, West Virginia University, 1124 Life Sciences Building, P.O. Box 6040, Morgantown, WV 26506-6040 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8049-8360
Brianna G SarnoDepartment of Psychology, West Virginia University, 1124 Life Sciences Building, P.O. Box 6040, Morgantown, WV 26506-6040 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1455-1212

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a scoping review of the behavior analytic self-control training (SCT) literature. To identify included articles, we searched key terms in six databases for articles published between 1988 and 2021. We included empirical articles that used a behavioral approach to self-control training with human participants for whom increasing self-control choice was a clinically significant goal and measured self-control and impulsive choice as dependent variables. Twenty-five experiments from 24 articles with a total of 79 participants were included in the review. This review aims to summarize the characteristics of SCT procedures and outcomes, provide recommendations for future research directions, and offer practical suggestions to clinicians incorporating SCT into practice. We examined similarities across studies regarding the independent variables manipulated in SCT, dependent variables measured, metrics of successful interventions, and assessment of generalization and maintenance of self-control choice. Twenty-one experiments arranged concurrent self-control- and impulsive-choice options with positive reinforcement, and four experiments arranged self-control training with negative-reinforcement contingencies. Variations of SCT included progressively increasing delays, intervening activities, signaled delays, antecedent rules, and commitment responses. Providing an intervening activity during the delay was largely successful at increasing self-control choice. Maintenance and generalization of increased self-control choice were assessed in two and three experiments, respectively. Future research should focus on improving the generality of SCT procedures in clinical settings by increasing terminal delays, fading out intervening activities, including probabilistic outcomes, and combining appetitive and aversive outcomes. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40617-023-00885-y.

Indexed as

ChoiceDelay discountingImpulsive choiceSelf-controlSelf-control training

Identifiers

PMID38405281
PMCPMC10890997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.