Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38405034›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2024

Prognosis of patients with residual pathological disease after neoadjuvant docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil therapy and surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

Mashiro Okunaka, Daisuke Kotani, Hisashi Fujiwara, Kazuma Sato, Naoto Fujiwara, Saori Mishima, Shingo Sakashita, Takayuki Yoshino, Takeo Fujita, Takashi Kojima

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Leveraging data-driven insights for esophageal and gastric cancer diagnosis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mashiro OkunakaDepartment of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8031-818X
Daisuke KotaniDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8577, Japan.
Hisashi FujiwaraDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, JapanDivision of Esophageal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Kazuma SatoDivision of Esophageal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Naoto FujiwaraDivision of Esophageal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Saori MishimaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Shingo SakashitaDivision of Pathology, Exploratory Oncology Research and Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Takayuki YoshinoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Takeo FujitaDivision of Esophageal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Takashi KojimaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
National Cancer Center Hospital East · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) combination chemotherapy has been established as one of the standard neoadjuvant therapies for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, little is known about prognostic factors in patients with residual pathological disease after neoadjuvant DCF followed by surgery for locally advanced ESCC who are candidates for adjuvant nivolumab. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate prognostic factors in patients with residual pathological disease after neoadjuvant DCF chemotherapy followed by surgery for locally advanced ESCC. Design: This was a retrospective cohort study. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who received neoadjuvant DCF followed by surgery for locally advanced ESCC between June 2014 and January 2020 at the National Cancer Center Hospital East. Results: Among a total of 210 patients, 45 patients (21.4%) achieved a pathological complete response. The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was significantly lower in patients with residual pathological disease than in those with a pathological complete response [53.5% Conclusion: In this largest-to-date cohort study, patients with residual pathological disease after neoadjuvant DCF followed by surgery for locally advanced ESCC had a poor prognosis. In these patients, pathological node positivity, including supraclavicular lymph node metastasis, and lymphovascular invasion were considered significant prognostic factors.

Indexed as

cisplatindocetaxelesophageal canceresophageal squamous cell carcinomafluorouracilneoadjuvantprognosis

Identifiers

PMID38405034
PMCPMC10894542
OpenAlexW4392113154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.