ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2024
The prevalence of bilateral hearing loss in the United States in 2019: a small area estimation modelling approach for obtaining national, state, and county level estimates by demographic subgroup.
Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adolescent Hearing Loss in China and the United States: Trends, Socioeconomic Disparities, and Noise Exposure From GBD 1990-2023 and NHANES 2005-2020.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- Role of harmonicity in counting and hearing out voices in polyphonic music: Effects of hearing loss.Hearing research · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Vitiligo-Associated Hearing Loss Among Patients in a Phase 2 Clinical Trial of Povorcitinib.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Biohybrid cochlear implants: neural interfaces, regenerative pathways, and translational benchmarks.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Review
- Genomic and Epigenomic Advances in Hearing Loss: Molecular Mechanisms, Diagnostics, and Emerging Therapies.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- The landscape of dementia in India: Prevalence, risk factors, and opportunities ahead.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular and sociodemographic factors associated with self-reported hearing loss: a cross-sectional analysis from the Polish PURE cohort.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Article
- Prevalence of Hearing Loss and Hearing Aid Use Among Hispanic Medicare Beneficiaries 65 Years and Older.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2025Article
- Comparison of Socioeconomic Factors Influencing Delay and Underuse of Cochlear Implants.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
- Geographic variation in women's empowerment: a multilevel analysis of India's National Family Health Survey 2021.Journal of global health · 2025Observational
- Exploring Adolescents' Perceptions of Hearing Loss and Hearing Aids in Greece: A Survey Study.Audiology research · 2025Article
- Tinnitus risk factors and its evolution over time.Nature communications · 2025Article
- An Analysis of Hearing Status and Hearing Healthcare Utilization of English-Speaking Expatriates in Thailand.Audiology & neuro-otology · 2025Article
- Hearing Care Within Diabetes Care: Strategies for Direct Inclusion.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025Article
- The Medicare annual wellness visit: An opportunity to improve health system identification of hearing loss?Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2024Article
- Hearing Aid Use Trends Among Older Adults by Income and Metropolitan vs Nonmetropolitan Residence.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- An Over-the-Counter Hearing Aid Clinical Trial in Rural Alabama: Project Design and Potential Implications for Pharmacy and Audiology Interprofessional Collaborations.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Rural-urban differences in modifiable dementia risk factors among U.S. populations aged 45 years or older.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The goal of this study was to re-estimate rates of bilateral hearing loss Nationally, and create new estimates of hearing loss prevalence at the U.S. State and County levels. Methods: We developed small area estimation models of mild, and moderate or worse bilateral hearing loss in the U.S. using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2001-2012, 2015-2018), the American Community Survey (2019), Census County Business Patterns (2019); Social Security Administration Data (2019); Medicare Fee-for-Service and Advantage claims data (2019); the Area Health Resources File (2019), and other sources. We defined hearing loss as mild (>25 dB through 40 dB), moderate or worse (>40 dB), or any (>25 dB) in the better hearing ear based on a 4-frequency pure-tone-average threshold, and created estimates by age group (0-4, 5-17, 18-34, 35-64, 65-74, 75+), gender, race and ethnicity, state, and county. Findings: We estimated that 37.9 million (95% Uncertainty Interval [U.I.] 36.6-39.1) Americans experienced any bilateral hearing loss; 24.9 million (95% U.I. 23.6-26.0) with mild and 13.0 million (95% U.I. 12.1-13.9) with moderate or worse. The prevalence rate of any hearing loss was 11.6% (95% U.I. 11.2%-12.0%). Hearing loss increased with age. Men were more likely to have hearing loss than women after age 35, and non-Hispanic Whites had higher rates of hearing loss than other races and ethnicities. Higher hearing loss prevalence was associated with smaller population size. West Virginia, Alaska, Wyoming, Oklahoma, and Arkansas had the highest standardised rate of bilateral hearing loss, and Washington D.C., New Jersey, New York, Maryland, and Connecticut had the lowest. Interpretation: Bilateral Hearing loss varies by State and County, with variation associated with population age, race and ethnicity, and population size. Geographic estimates can be used to raise local awareness of hearing loss as a problem, to prioritize areas for hearing loss prevention, identification, and treatment, and to guide future research on the hearing loss risk factors that contribute to these differences. Funding: CDC's National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Population Health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.