ReviewTranslational lung cancer research2024
Lung cancer in females-sex-based differences from males in epidemiology, biology, and outcomes: a narrative review.
Review in Translational lung cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early and late CTCAE and patient-reported outcomes following lung cancer radiotherapy: A sex-stratified descriptive analysis from the REQUITE cohort.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Perspectives on sex and gender inclusion in clinical practice guidelines: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Ever-smokers in Norway and lung cancer: median time from self-reported smoking debut to lung cancer diagnosis in 11 prospective population studies (CONOR).ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Donor-specific, but not sex-specific, signatures dominate cell-type classification in lung scRNA-seq data.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
- Impact of Surgical Resection on 5-Year Survival in Elderly NSCLC Patients: A SEER Database Analysis With Machine Learning-Based Predictive Modeling in Patients Aged ≥ 60 (2000-2021).Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Global inequalities in tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer care quality from 1990 to 2021.iScience · 2026Article
- Sex- and age- specific lung cancer incidence and mortality among Medicaid beneficiaries with and without HIV, 2001-2015.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Sex Differences in Cancer Stage at Diagnosis of Nonreproductive Solid Organ Tumors in the United States, 2015 to 2022.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026Article
- Sex representation in trials relative to indication-specific disease burden in FDA-approved drugs (2015-2023).Nature communications · 2026Article
- Global, regional, and national trends in burden of lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and associated risk factors, 1990-2021: results from the global burden of disease study 2021.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2026Article
- Sexually distinct multi-omic responses to progressive endurance exercise training in the rat lung.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Sex-based immune differences influence tumor progression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Oral oncology · 2026Article
- Comparison of Mediastinal Metastases of Primary Lung Cancer Versus Extrathoracic Malignancies in Patients Obtained with Endobronchial Ultrasonography-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Biopsy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Surgical outcomes of left atrial resection for lung cancer: A single-center study.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2026Article
- Article
- Radicality of mediastinal lymphadenectomy in anatomic lung resection for lung cancer: a comparative analysis of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic and robotic-assisted thoracoscopic approaches.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Towards Personalised Screening for Lung Cancer: A Sex-Stratified Approach in a Danish Cohort Integrating Pre-Diagnostic Systemic Inflammatory Indexes with Smoking Status and Age.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2026Article
- Symptom clusters and network analysis in lung cancer patients receiving taxane-based chemotherapy: a comprehensive assessment using the CIPNAT multi-scale tool.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Review
- Lung Cancer in Never-Smokers: Risk Factors, Driver Mutations, and Therapeutic Advances.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: The role of biological sex is seldom considered in characterizing lung cancer, the deadliest cancer in both the United States and the world. Lung cancer has traditionally been regarded as a male disease; as such, research in female-specific phenomena is frequently conflicting or absent. Currently, disparities in lung cancer incidence are primarily driven by females, especially non-smokers and those of younger age. This narrative review provides insight into sex-specific characteristics of lung cancer, highlighting risk factors, diagnosis patterns, carcinogenesis, and treatment outcomes in females. Methods: The PubMed database was searched on July 26, 2023 to identify research published between 2013 and 2023 in English. Sixty-three articles were considered relevant, and their full texts and citations were studied to compile information for this narrative review. Key Content and Findings: Exposure-related risk factors, including personal tobacco use, are thought to impact female lung cancer risk more profoundly. However, studies on occupational exposures are underpowered to conclude risk in females. Data characterizing the effect of endogenous and exogenous hormonal exposures on female lung cancer risk remain two-sided. Screening guidelines are tailored to white males, exacerbating sex and race disparities. The effect of biological sex on carcinogenesis and the immune system response to cancer is not fully understood, though the female immune system clearly reacts more aggressively to lung cancer. In early-stage disease, females have greater survival in the perioperative setting and during follow-up of several years, attributed to favorable histopathology and healthier baseline status. Sex-specific response to systemic treatment continues to be optimized as lack of standardization in randomized trials makes interpreting results difficult when aggregated. Conclusions: Biological sex plays a critical role in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), though further study is needed to depict the complex web of factors that affect lung cancer risk, development, and outcomes. Female underrepresentation in studies has contributed to this lack of understanding. As these disparities are eliminated, we can move towards more effective treatment for both sexes in this pervasive yet deadly disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.