ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2024
Evaluation of the ability of commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays to measure mouse tissue factor.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Beginner's Guide to Study the Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Coagulation.Journal of extracellular biology · 2026Review
- Pathways regulating the levels of tissue factor-positive extracellular vesicles and activation of coagulation in endotoxemic mice.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2025Article
- Challenges with measuring tissue factor antigen and activity in human plasma.Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis · 2024Review
- Mouse tissue factor enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays: a sensitive issue.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Tissue factor (TF) is the primary cellular initiator of the blood coagulation cascade. Increased levels of TF expression on circulating monocytes or on extracellular vesicles (EVs) are associated with thrombosis in a variety of diseases, including sepsis and COVID-19. Objectives: Here, we aimed to evaluate the ability of 4 commercial TF enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) to measure mouse TF in cells and plasma. Methods: We used 4 commercial mouse TF ELISAs (SimpleStep, R&D Systems, MyBioSource [sandwich], and MyBioSource [competitive]). We used recombinant mouse TF (rmTF; 16-1000 pg/mL), cell lysates from a TF-expressing mouse pancreatic cancer cell line, and plasma and EVs isolated from plasma from mice injected with vehicle or bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Results: The 2 MyBioSource kits failed to detect rmTF or TF in cell lysates. The SimpleStep and R&D kits detected rmTF in buffer or spiked into plasma in a concentration-dependent manner. These kits also detected TF in cell lysates from a mouse pancreatic cancer cell line. A higher signal was observed with the SimpleStep kit compared to the R&D kit. However, the SimpleStep and R&D kits failed to detect TF in plasma or EVs from LPS-treated mice. Conclusion: Our results indicate that some commercial ELISAs can be used to measure mouse TF levels in cell lysates but they cannot detect TF in plasma or EVs from endotoxemic mice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.