ArticleHeliyon2024
Nurses retrospective view on nursing education: A repeated cross-sectional study over three decades.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Learning to Leadership Development: Exploring Educational Leadership Competencies Among Undergraduate Nursing Students.Nursing & health sciences · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of game-based learning in mental health nursing education on self-directed learning and academic self-efficacy among nursing students.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Nurse leader perspectives of organisational capacity for higher education: implications for nursing education policy.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Nurses' assessments of the work environment, organisational culture and work arrangements: a cross-sectional study of Estonian hospitals in 1999, 2009 and 2021.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Humanistic nursing curriculum needs: a cross-sectional survey in Shenzhen, China.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As the healthcare landscape undergoes transformative shifts due to factors like ageing demographics, technological innovations, rapid global dissemination of infectious diseases, and imperatives for accessible, cost-effective care, a pressing need emerges for the contemporisation of nursing education. Notably, there is a paucity of research delving into nurses' introspective evaluations of their educational experiences after their immersion in professional settings. Objective: This study aimed to examine nurses' evaluations of their educational background over 30 years and identify relationships between their assessments and their demographic. Design: The study embraced a recurrent cross-sectional survey methodology, encompassing three distinct quantitative cross-sectional evaluations conducted in the years 1999, 2009, and 2021. Context/participants: The cohort for this inquiry consisted of nurses stationed in Estonian general hospitals and inpatient departments of developmental plan institutions, each with at least one year of professional experience. Cumulatively, 832 nurses were engaged across three sequential evaluations: Study I (n = 463), Study II (n = 198), and Study III (n = 171). Methods: Data procurement was executed via a structured survey, with subsequent analytical procedures encompassing descriptive and correlational methodologies. Results: A discernible augmentation in the educational calibre of nurses was observed with each successive evaluation. This escalation concomitated enhanced positive assessments in areas like evidence-informed education, skill development, and autonomous operational capabilities. Yet, a critical appraisal persisted concerning their competencies in navigating complex patient interactions and addressing socio-religious dilemmas. Conclusions: The merit of this investigation lies in its illumination of nursing education's evolution, as perceived retrospectively by nurses who have operationalized their academic learnings in real-world scenarios. Their vantage point, inherently informed by practice, uniquely positions them to earmark avenues of refinement. This exploration paves the way for enrichments in nursing education, spotlighting the imperative of equipping nurses to adeptly manage intricate situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.