ArticleHeliyon2024
Inter-hospital moderate and advanced Alzheimer's disease detection through convolutional neural networks.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Connectogram-COH: A Coherence-Based Time-Graph Representation for EEG-Based Alzheimer's Disease Detection.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) has been a fundamental technique in the identification of health conditions since its discovery. This analysis specifically centers on machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methodologies designed for the analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) data to categorize individuals with Alzheimer's Disease (AD) into two groups: Moderate or Advanced Alzheimer's dementia. Our study is based on a comprehensive database comprising 668 volunteers from 5 different hospitals, collected over a decade. This diverse dataset enables better training and validation of our results. Among the methods evaluated, the CNN (deep learning) approach outperformed others, achieving a remarkable classification accuracy of 97.45% for patients with Moderate Alzheimer's Dementia (ADM) and 97.03% for patients with Advanced Alzheimer's Dementia (ADA). Importantly, all the compared methods were rigorously assessed under identical conditions. The proposed DL model, specifically CNN, effectively extracts time domain features from EEG data in time, resulting in a significant reduction in learnable parameters and data redundancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.