Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38404820›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Enhancing lung cancer detection through hybrid features and machine learning hyperparameters optimization techniques.

Liangyu Li, Jing Yang, Lip Yee Por, Mohammad Shahbaz Khan, Rim Hamdaoui, Lal Hussain, Zahoor Iqbal, Ionela Magdalena Rotaru, Dan Dobrotă, Moutaz Aldrdery and 1 more

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Liangyu LiCenter for Software Technology and Management, Faculty of Information Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Jing YangDepartment of Computer System and Technology, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Lip Yee PorDepartment of Computer System and Technology, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Mohammad Shahbaz KhanChildren's National Hospital, 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington, DC, 20010, United States.
Rim HamdaouiDepartment of Computer Science, College of Science and Human Studies Dawadmi, Shaqra University, Shaqra, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Lal HussainDepartment of Computer Science and Information Technology, King Abdullah Campus Chatter Kalas, University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad, 13100, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan.
Zahoor IqbalSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, 321004, China.
Ionela Magdalena RotaruDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Bulevardul Victoriei 10, Sibiu, 550024, Romania.
Dan DobrotăFaculty of Engineering, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Bulevardul Victoriei 10, Sibiu, 550024, Romania.
Moutaz AldrderyDepartment of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha, 61411, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulfattah OmarDepartment of English, College of Science & Humanities, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning offers significant potential for lung cancer detection, enabling early diagnosis and potentially improving patient outcomes. Feature extraction remains a crucial challenge in this domain. Combining the most relevant features can further enhance detection accuracy. This study employed a hybrid feature extraction approach, which integrates both Gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) with Haralick and autoencoder features with an autoencoder. These features were subsequently fed into supervised machine learning methods. Support Vector Machine (SVM) Radial Base Function (RBF) and SVM Gaussian achieved perfect performance measures, while SVM polynomial produced an accuracy of 99.89% when utilizing GLCM with an autoencoder, Haralick, and autoencoder features. SVM Gaussian achieved an accuracy of 99.56%, while SVM RBF achieved an accuracy of 99.35% when utilizing GLCM with Haralick features. These results demonstrate the potential of the proposed approach for developing improved diagnostic and prognostic lung cancer treatment planning and decision-making systems.

Indexed as

Autoencoder and gray-level co-occurrence (GLCM)ClassificationHaralick texture featuresLung cancer types

Identifiers

PMID38404820
PMCPMC10884486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.