ArticleHealth information science and systems2024
Hierarchical classification of early microscopic lung nodule based on cascade network.
Article in Health information science and systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual sagittal-guided coarse-to-fine rib segmentation and numbering in chest CT.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Multi-phase deep learning framework with Multiscale Adaptive Swin Transformer and embedding attention for precision lung nodule detection and classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Early-stage lung cancer is typically characterized clinically by the presence of isolated lung nodules. Thousands of cases are examined each year, and one case usually contains numerous lung CT slices. Detecting and classifying early microscopic lung nodules is demanding due to their diminutive dimensions and restricted characterization capabilities. Therefore, a lung nodule classification model that performs well and is sensitive to microscopic lung nodules is needed to accurately classify lung nodules. Methods: This paper uses the Resnet34 network as a basic classification model. A new cascade lung nodule classification method is proposed to classify lung nodules into 6 classes instead of the traditional 2 or 4 classes. It can effectively classify six different nodule types including ground-glass and solid nodules, benign and malignant nodules, and nodules with predominantly ground-glass or solid components. Results: In this paper, the traditional multi-classification method and the cascade classification method proposed in this paper were tested using real lung nodule data collected in the clinic. The test results demonstrate that the cascade classification method in this study achieves an accuracy of 80.04 Conclusions: Different from the existing methods for categorizing the benign and malignant nature of lung nodules, the approach presented in this paper can classify lung nodules into 6 categories more accurately. At the same time, This paper proposes a rapid, precise, and dependable approach for classifying six distinct categories of lung nodules, which increases the accuracy categorization compared with the traditional multivariate categorization method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.