Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38404674›Full record

ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2024

Reflect, Inspire, Strengthen, and Empower 2.0 Program: Advancing Careers and Leadership for Women Physician Staff in an Academic Institution.

Ji Yun Kang, Ivana T Croghan, Caroline L Matchett, Laura E Raffals, Anne A Schletty, Tammy R Monson, Karen M Fischer, Erin M Pagel, Karthik Ghosh, Anjali Bhagra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ji Yun KangDepartment of Human Resources, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Ivana T CroghanDivision of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Caroline L MatchettDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Laura E RaffalsDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Anne A SchlettyInternal Medicine Administrative Services, and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Tammy R MonsonDivision of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Karen M FischerDivision of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Erin M PagelInternal Medicine Administrative Services, and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Karthik GhoshDivision of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Anjali BhagraDivision of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To study the effects of the Reflect, Inspire, Strengthen, and Empower (RISE) 2.0 Program designed for professional development of women staff. Topics included emotional intelligence, appreciative coaching, resilience, and strategic career development. Methods: The RISE 2.0 program was held between September 2020 and February 2021. After each session, program satisfaction surveys were sent to evaluate whether session objectives were met. Professional network, professional mentor, and professional goals were surveyed at the introductory session and at 1 month after the program ended. Survey data about leadership self-efficacy, motivation to lead, and well-being were collected at the introductory session (baseline) and at months 1 and 3 to evaluate the sustainability of program outcomes. Results: Of the 71 notified, 41 (58%) committed to the program. Results increased for having a robust professional network from baseline to month 1 for very good (7.3% to 13.3%) and excellent (19.5% to 40%). Those who responded favorably to setting and attaining ambitious goals increased from 78.1% to 93.3%. For leadership self-efficacy, all except 2 respondents reported an increase in ratings from baseline to month 3. Motivation to lead changed only slightly. Well-being scores fluctuated as affected by daily needs and fulfillment. For 10 of 15 respondents, well-being increased overall from baseline to month 1 or 3, from month 1 to 3. Conclusions: Based on participant evaluations and feedback, the RISE 2.0 program received positive responses overall in achieving its learning goals. The program exhibited promise in fostering career advancement and leadership development, particularly when assessed using indicators predictive of successful leadership, such as self-efficacy, motivation to lead, and overall wellbeing.

Indexed as

appreciative coachingcareer developmentemotional intelligenceleadership self-efficacyphysician leadershipwell-being

Identifiers

PMID38404674
PMCPMC10890958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.