ArticleGlobal cardiology science & practice2024
Rurality and race in heart failure risk: Insights from the Southern Community Cohort Study.
Article in Global cardiology science & practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends, disparities and projections of pericardial diseases related mortality in the United States: A 1999-2035 analysis using artificial deep neural network.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Demographics and mortality trends of hypertensive heart failure in the United States, 2006-2020: Insights from the CDC WONDER database.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Observational
- Heart failure and tobacco use disorder: mortality trends and disparities in the United States.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Health-promoting behaviors among patients with heart failure: A cross-sectional study in Georgia.Global cardiology science & practice · 2025Article
- Demographic trends and disparities in mortality related to coexisting heart failure and diabetes mellitus among older adults in the United States between 1999 and 2020: A retrospective population-based cohort study from the CDC WONDER database.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRural-urban health disparities are apparent in the burden of disease and health outcomes, including cardiovascular disease (CVD), specifically heart failure (HF). However, the factors influencing these disparities are not fully understood. Study and results: Among 27,115 participants in the Southern Community Cohort Study (SCCS) (mean age: 54 years (47-65)), 18,647 (68.8%) were black, 8,468 (32.3%) were white, and 20% resided in rural areas. Over a median 13-year follow-up period, 7,542 HF events occurred (rural = 1,865 vs. urban = 5,677). The age-adjusted HF incidence was 29.6 (95% CI, 28.9-30.5) and 36.5 (95% CI, 34.9-38.3) per 1,000 person-years for urban and rural participants, respectively ( LESSONS LEARNED: This large study shows that rural populations have an increased incidence of HF, which is particularly striking among women and black men, independent of individual-level biological, behavioral, and sociocultural risk factors. It also shows the need for further investigation into the rurality-associated risk of HF, the impact of preventive care utilization on the risk of HF and interpersonal, community, or societal factors that could contribute to rural-urban disparities. This will help to guide public health efforts aimed at HF prevention among rural populations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.