Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38404591›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Prognostic stratification of sepsis through DNA damage response based RiskScore system: insights from single-cell RNA-sequencing and transcriptomic profiling.

Qingjiang Lin, Rongyao Zeng, Jinfeng Yang, Zebo Xu, Shaoxiong Jin, Guan Wei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qingjiang Lin *Department of Emergency Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, China.
Rongyao Zeng *Department of Emergency Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, China.
Jinfeng YangDepartment of Emergency Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, China.
Zebo XuDepartment of Emergency Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, China.
Shaoxiong JinDepartment of Emergency Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, China.
Guan WeiDepartment of Emergency Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, China.
Fujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A novel risk scoring system, predicated on DNA damage response (DDR), was developed to enhance prognostic predictions and potentially inform the creation of more effective therapeutic protocols for sepsis. Methods: To thoroughly delineate the expression profiles of DDR markers within the context of sepsis, an analytical approach utilizing single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) was implemented. Our study utilized single-cell analysis techniques alongside weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to pinpoint the genes that exhibit the most substantial associations with DNA damage response (DDR). Through Cox proportional hazards LASSO regression, we distinguished DDR-associated genes and established a risk model, enabling the stratification of patients into high- and low-risk groups. Subsequently, we carried out an analysis to determine our model's predictive accuracy regarding patient survival. Moreover, we examined the distinct biological characteristics, various signal transduction routes, and immune system responses in sepsis patients, considering different risk categories and outcomes related to survival. Lastly, we conducted experimental validation of the identified genes through Results: Both single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and bulk transcriptomic analyses have demonstrated a strong correlation between DNA damage response (DDR) levels and sepsis prognosis. Specific cell subtypes, including monocytes, megakaryocytes, CD4+ T cells, and neutrophils, have shown elevated DDR activity. Cells with increased DDR scores exhibited more robust and numerous interactions with other cell populations. The weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and single-cell analyses revealed 71 DDR-associated genes. We developed a four-gene risk scoring system using ARL4C, CD247, RPL7, and RPL31, identified through univariate COX, LASSO COX regression, and log-rank (Mantel-Cox) tests. Nomograms, calibration plots, and decision curve analyses (DCA) regarding these specific genes have provided significant clinical benefits for individuals diagnosed with sepsis. The study suggested that individuals categorized as lower-risk demonstrated enhanced infiltration of immune cells, upregulated expression of immune regulators, and a more prolific presence of immune-associated functionalities and pathways. RT-qPCR analyses on a sepsis rat model revealed differential gene expression predominantly in the four targeted genes. Furthermore, ARL4C knockdown in sepsis model Conclusion: The delineated DDR expression landscape offers insights into sepsis pathogenesis, whilst our riskScore model, based on a robust four-gene signature, could underpin personalized sepsis treatment strategies.

Indexed as

SepsisADP-Ribosylation FactorsAnimalsDNA RepairGene Expression ProfilingHumansPrognosisRatsRNAADP-Ribosylation FactorsARL4C protein, humanRNADNA damage responseimmune responseprognostic modelsepsissingle-cell RNA-sequencing

Identifiers

PMID38404591
PMCPMC10884272
OpenAlexW4391689877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.