Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38404553›Full record

ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2024

Inflatable penile prosthesis placement in Peyronie's disease: a review of surgical considerations, approaches, and maneuvers.

Jacob Good, Nikos Crist, Brittney Henderson, Christian Karcher, John Sencaj, Helen L Bernie

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. MR imaging of penile pathology and prostheses.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jacob GoodDepartment of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Nikos CristDepartment of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Brittney HendersonPhiladelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Christian KarcherDepartment of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
John SencajDepartment of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Helen L BernieDepartment of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Indiana University School of MedicineIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USPhiladelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peyronie's disease (PD) is a fibrotic disorder of the tunica albuginea that results in penile deformity and/or curvature. Patients usually present complaining of penile pain, shortening and deformity resulting in dissatisfaction with intercourse. Many patients with PD will present with concomitant erectile dysfunction (ED). This disease is a significant concern for patients as it impacts both sexual function and overall quality of life. While there are several interventions available for PD treatment, inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation is considered the gold standard approach for those with moderate to severe concomitant ED, refractory to medical therapy. The goal of treatment is to give a man a functionally straight erection. Placement of an IPP alone may achieve this. However, when curvature still exists, several adjunct procedures may be performed to include manual modeling, plication, plaque incision or excision and grafting. Additionally, advanced lengthening procedures may also be used. In this paper we will present a comprehensive review of the adjuvant straightening techniques that can be used during IPP placement in men with PD and refractory ED when curvature still exists. Patient selection is a key predictor of implant success, as is preoperative and postoperative management to optimize overall patient care and satisfaction. These topics along with the different surgical approaches to IPP insertion for PD will also be discussed, including the benefits and shortcomings of each. A flowchart to aid surgeons in their intraoperative decision making based on curvature characteristics and specific patient concerns is presented.

Indexed as

Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP)Peyronie’s disease (PD)plication, plaque excision and grafting (PEG)

Identifiers

PMID38404553
PMCPMC10891387
OpenAlexW4391226986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.