ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2024
The urologist's role in bowel management of adult spina bifida: a narrative review.
Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Urologists are central to the coordinated care of patients with spina bifida (SB), and efforts to optimize bladder management and protection of the upper tracts are well established. However, the urologist's role in treating this population often extends to the management of bowel dysfunction which may be less defined. The methods available to the urologist for bowel management range from lifestyle modifications to medical and surgical therapy, with many patients requiring combinations of multiple strategies to combat conflicting symptoms of constipation and fecal incontinence (FI). This narrative review aims to compile a detailed algorithm of management options, for the practicing urologist to more confidently address this important facet of care. Methods: A detailed review was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar databases to assess the contemporary literature surrounding neurogenic bowel dysfunction in adult SB. Articles published in English between 1990 and 2023 were considered. Key Content and Findings: This review presents and investigates a schema of increasingly definitive and invasive treatments for bowel dysfunction including lifestyle adaptations, pharmacological treatment, transanal irrigation (TAI), sacral neuromodulation (SNM), antegrade continence procedures, and bowel diversion. TAI and medical bowel care are beneficial in postponing or avoiding more invasive surgical interventions. Should conservative measures prove ineffective, surgical management provides the most definitive bowel control. Conclusions: Symptoms of constipation and FI that result from neurogenic bowel are best managed with an individualized approach guided by the general treatment algorithm presented in this review. Educated on the numerous appropriate options, patients will often trial methods before proceeding with more invasive treatments. Additional work is required to further evaluate management options specific to the SB populations, especially in more contemporary and largely experimental treatment modalities such as SNM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.