Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38404547›Full record

ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2024

The urologist's role in bowel management of adult spina bifida: a narrative review.

Malcolm Sundell, George E Koch, Melissa Kaufman

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Malcolm SundellLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center, School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
George E KochDepartment of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Melissa KaufmanDepartment of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USUniversity of Washington Medical Center · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Urologists are central to the coordinated care of patients with spina bifida (SB), and efforts to optimize bladder management and protection of the upper tracts are well established. However, the urologist's role in treating this population often extends to the management of bowel dysfunction which may be less defined. The methods available to the urologist for bowel management range from lifestyle modifications to medical and surgical therapy, with many patients requiring combinations of multiple strategies to combat conflicting symptoms of constipation and fecal incontinence (FI). This narrative review aims to compile a detailed algorithm of management options, for the practicing urologist to more confidently address this important facet of care. Methods: A detailed review was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar databases to assess the contemporary literature surrounding neurogenic bowel dysfunction in adult SB. Articles published in English between 1990 and 2023 were considered. Key Content and Findings: This review presents and investigates a schema of increasingly definitive and invasive treatments for bowel dysfunction including lifestyle adaptations, pharmacological treatment, transanal irrigation (TAI), sacral neuromodulation (SNM), antegrade continence procedures, and bowel diversion. TAI and medical bowel care are beneficial in postponing or avoiding more invasive surgical interventions. Should conservative measures prove ineffective, surgical management provides the most definitive bowel control. Conclusions: Symptoms of constipation and FI that result from neurogenic bowel are best managed with an individualized approach guided by the general treatment algorithm presented in this review. Educated on the numerous appropriate options, patients will often trial methods before proceeding with more invasive treatments. Additional work is required to further evaluate management options specific to the SB populations, especially in more contemporary and largely experimental treatment modalities such as SNM.

Indexed as

antegrade continence enemaconstipationfecal incontinence (FI)Neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD)spina bifida (SB)

Identifiers

PMID38404547
PMCPMC10891392
OpenAlexW4391226910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.