ArticleBiophysical reports2024
Philament: A filament tracking program to quickly and accurately analyze in vitro motility assays.
Article in Biophysical reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- MultiBac System-based Purification and Biophysical Characterization of Human Myosin-7a.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In vitro motility (IVM) assays allow for the examination of the basic interaction between cytoskeletal filaments with molecular motors and the influence many physiological factors have on this interaction. Examples of factors that can be studied include changes in ADP and pH that emulate fatigue, altered phosphorylation that can occur with disease, and mutations within myofilament proteins that cause disease. While IVM assays can be analyzed manually, the main limitation is the ability to extract accurate data rapidly from videos collected without individual bias. While programs have been created in the past to enable data extraction, many are now out of date or require the use of proprietary software. Here, we report the generation of a Python-based tracking program, Philament, which automatically extracts data on instantaneous and average velocities, and allows for fully automated analysis of IVM recordings. The data generated are presented in an easily accessible spreadsheet-based, comma-separated values file. Philament also contains a novel method of quantifying the smoothness of filament motion. By fitting curves to standard deviations of velocity and average velocities, the influence of different experimental conditions can be compared relative to one another. This comparison provides a qualitative measure of protein interactions where steeper slopes indicate more unstable interactions and shallower slopes indicate more stable interactions within the myofilament. Overall, Philament's automation of IVM analysis provides easier entry into the field of cardiovascular mechanics and enables users to create a truly high-throughput experimental data analysis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.