Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38404527›Full record

ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2024

Performance evaluation of the new Sysmex XR-Series haematology analyser.

Kenichi Fujimaki, Kornelia Hummel, Immaculate Magonde, Katharina Dammert, Yoshiko Hamaguchi, Konstantinos Mintzas, Jarob Saker, Ondrej Valina, Klaus-Martin Otte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kenichi FujimakiSysmex R&D Centre Europe, Norderstedt, Germany.
Kornelia HummelMVZ MEDILYS Laborgesellschaft mbH, Hamburg, Germany.
Immaculate MagondeSysmex R&D Centre Europe, Norderstedt, Germany.
Katharina DammertSysmex Europe SE, Norderstedt, Germany.
Yoshiko HamaguchiSysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan.
Konstantinos MintzasSysmex Europe SE, Norderstedt, Germany.
Jarob SakerSysmex Europe SE, Norderstedt, Germany.
Ondrej ValinaSysmex Europe SE, Norderstedt, Germany.
Klaus-Martin OtteMVZ MEDILYS Laborgesellschaft mbH, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The new XR-Series haematology analyser from Sysmex provides increased throughput and automation, along with a new reagent in WDF channel for optimised WBC differential. Methods: An analytical performance study for the XR analyser was conducted to evaluate the WDF channel parameters in comparison to the instrument specifications. Additionally, 7460 samples were measured on XR and XN analysers to compare selected parameters and flags, and 930 randomly selected samples were further evaluated with microscopy. Results: All investigated aspects of the analytical performance study for the XR fell within the manufacturer specifications. The correlation coefficients between the two systems for the parameters tested were greater than 0.983 for the main CBC and DIFF parameters, greater than 0.909 for the Extended Inflammation Parameters, and greater than 0.932 for the parameters used in the workflow rulesets of the Conclusion: The XR analyser had very good analytical performance, and highly comparable results to the predecessor XN analyser in all investigated parameters, flags and workflow aspects.

Indexed as

Analytical performanceFlagging performanceMethod comparisonSysmex XN-SeriesSysmex XR-SeriesWhole blood analysis

Identifiers

PMID38404527
PMCPMC10884972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.