ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2024
Establishing reference intervals for soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor in Northern European adults.
Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) may have untapped potential in clinical diagnostics. Previous studies determined reference intervals using an enzyme-linked immunoassay, but there is a need for reference intervals using a faster assay if the analysis is to be used in emergency medicine. The current study aims to determine reference intervals for suPAR using a fully automated particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay (PETIA) according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guideline A28-A3c. Design and methods: Blood samples were prospectively collected from Danish blood donors. Plasma suPAR was analyzed on the cobas 8000 module c502 in an open channel using a PETIA. Sex-partitioned reference intervals were determined using a parametric quantile approach. Results: The study included 241 participants-123 females and 118 males. The common reference interval for suPAR was 1.56-4.11 ng/mL (95% confidence intervals (CI) for the lower and upper limits were 1.56-1.63 and 3.81-4.47, respectively). The reference interval for females was 1.59-4.65 ng/mL (95% CIs 1.48-1.70 and 4.09-5.48, respectively) and for males, 1.56-3.59 ng/mL (95% CIs 1.47-1.65 and 3.31-3.93, respectively). Conclusions: Our results support using sex-partitioned reference intervals for suPAR and provide a basis for future studies using the PETIA method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.