Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38404516›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2024

Tobacco use in currently married pregnant & lactating women in India; key findings from the National Family Health Survey-5.

Amrit Virk, Meenu Kalia, Parmal Singh, Suresh Kumar Sharma, Sonu Goel, Sukhbir Singh, Sahil Sharma

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prerequisite for reproducible science: a call to embrace code sharing.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Amrit VirkDepartment of Community Medicine, Dr. BR Ambedkar State Institute of Medical Sciences (AIMS), Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar, Punjab, India.
Meenu KaliaDepartment of Community Medicine, Government Medical College and Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh, Punjab, India.
Parmal SinghDepartment of Community Medicine, Adesh Medical College & Hospital, Shahabad, Kurukshetra, Haryana, India.
Suresh Kumar SharmaDepartment of Statistics, Panjab University, Chandigarh, Punjab, India.
Sonu GoelDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Punjab, India.
Sukhbir SinghPopulation Research Center, Panjab University, Chandigarh, Punjab, India.
Sahil SharmaDepartment of Community Medicine, Dr. BR Ambedkar State Institute of Medical Sciences (AIMS), Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar, Punjab, India.
Institute of Medical Sciences · INGovernment Medical College and Hospital · INPanjab University · INPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Tobacco use among pregnant and lactating women carries dangerous repercussions for women and their children. Limited information is available at the national level on the prevalence and determinants of tobacco use in this vulnerable sub-population of women. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of tobacco use among currently married pregnant and lactating women and its association with demographic, behavioural and regional determinants in India. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted during which secondary data from the fifth National Family Health Survey, 2019-2020, was analysed. The prevalence and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) for different forms of tobacco use were documented among currently married pregnant and lactating women. Adjusted Odds Ratio and 95% CI were calculated using multivariate logistic regression to identify the independent factors associated with different forms of tobacco use among respondents after applying sampling weights. Findings: In India, the prevalence of tobacco use among currently married pregnant and lactating women was 2.5% and 3.2%, respectively, with over 85% of tobacco-using currently married pregnant (85.6%) and lactating (85.6%) women using smokeless tobacco (SLT) only. Age group 30-34 years, working women and the richest wealth quintile were found to be independent predictors of smoked tobacco use among currently married pregnant women. In contrast, among the currently married lactating women, the middle wealth quintile and South Indian region were found to be independent predictors of smoked tobacco use. Interpretation: Smokeless tobacco was found to be the most prevalent type of tobacco consumed by pregnant and lactating women in India. There is an urgent need to curb tobacco use in this vulnerable sub-population of women in the country by sensitising them to the harmful consequences of tobacco use by integrating tobacco awareness and cessation services during routine ante-natal examinations. Funding: No funding was received for this study.

Indexed as

Lactating women and health risksPregnant womenSmokeless tobaccoTobacco

Identifiers

PMID38404516
PMCPMC10884969
OpenAlexW4386700194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.