Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38404512›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2024

Technologies for strengthening immunization coverage in India: a systematic review.

Nonita Dudeja, Tila Khan, Deepak Thomas Varughese, Sebin George Abraham, Marilyn Mary Ninan, Christie Leya Prasad, Rajiv Sarkar, Gagandeep Kang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nonita DudejaCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India.
Tila KhanSchool of Medical Science & Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, West Bengal, India.
Deepak Thomas VarugheseDepartment of Community Medicine, Believers Church Medical College, Thiruvalla, Kerala, India.
Sebin George AbrahamDepartment of Community Health, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Marilyn Mary NinanDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Christie Leya PrasadChristian Hospital Bissamcuttack, Rayagada District, Odisha, India.
Rajiv SarkarIndian Institute of Public Health Shillong, Shillong, Meghalaya, India.
Gagandeep KangDivision of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Immunization coverage varies across India in different settings, geographic areas and populations. Technologies for improving immunization access can reduce disparities in coverage. This systematic review, which follows PRISMA guidelines, aims to examine the technologies for strengthening immunization coverage in India. Methods: Studies published between January 1, 2011 and July 31, 2021 were searched in Medline (through PubMed), Cochrane Library and Google Scholar. All observational and experimental studies, except qualitative studies, were included. Studies published in the English language and related to technologies for strengthening immunization, conducted on children, pregnant women, adults, elderly, healthcare personnel, caregivers and vulnerable populations across all Indian settings were included. Non-English articles, protocols, commentaries, letters, abstracts, correspondence, opinion articles, modelling, narrative and systematic reviews were excluded. Two reviewers screened studies independently, extracted data in a standardized sheet and appraised the study quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The primary outcome was technologies that improved immunization coverage. The protocol is registered with OSF (https://osf.io/r42gm). Findings: 6592 titles and abstracts were screened, and data extracted from 23 India-specific studies. Quality of 22/23 studies was average or above. Technologies identified included reminder systems, capacity building, community engagement and wearable technologies. Automated incentivised mobile phone reminders, immunization due-list, computerized data tracking, community mobilization and campaigns improved vaccine coverage, although effectiveness of some varied viz., reminder systems, and across states. Newer technologies included the Jyotigram Yojana, Digital Near-field Communication Pendants, "Reaching Every District" Programme and the "My Village My Home" tool. Interpretation: Technologies for improving immunization systems, capacity building and community engagement were effective. Newer technologies on vaccine delivery, mapping and cold chain logistics were not evaluated in India or were ineffective. There were limited studies in populations other than children and pregnant women. Future work is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of identified technologies across diverse settings. Funding: No funding was received for preparing this manuscript.

Indexed as

CoverageImmunizationIndiaSystematic reviewTechnology

Identifiers

PMID38404512
PMCPMC10884965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.