Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38404484›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2024

Case study and pilot results: Stepwise approach to teach a resident tube shunt surgery.

Hassaan Asif, Jessie Wang, Mary Qiu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hassaan AsifPritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jessie WangDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Mary QiuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To illustrate the utility of a previously published stepwise rubric for evaluating a resident's progress learning aqueous tube shunt surgery. Method: Using a stepwise rubric, a single PGY3 ophthalmology resident and attending glaucoma surgeon evaluated the resident's performance after each aqueous tube shunt surgery. The rubric subdivides the surgery into 12 consecutive steps and scores the resident's proficiency in each step with either a 0 (observation), 2 (novice), 3 (beginner), 4 (advanced beginner), or 5 (competent). Results: The resident's cumulative score increased significantly throughout the 17 surgeries performed, with the resident's self-evaluated score and attending's score increasing from 12 to 27 and 14 to 27 from the first to last surgery, respectively. Scores were consistent between the resident and attending; for any given surgery, the resident's own score never deviated from the attending's score by more than 1 point. The resident completed at least 50% of the steps in 11 of the 17 cases. While some surgical steps were mastered earlier on ("tube tying" and "suture implantation"), other steps were more challenging to master ("tunnel in sclera and enter the AC" and "close conjunctiva", as demonstrated by fewer overall attempts or never attaining a score of '5' despite multiple attempts. Conclusions and Importance: This study demonstrates the utility of the stepwise rubric in tracking resident surgical scores chronologically via self and attending assessment. The ability to compare their own scores to that of an attending allows the resident to learn how to effectively evaluate their own performance. Most importantly, statistics obtained for each step provides the resident with personalized and real-time feedback for learning specific surgical steps. In conclusion, the stepwise rubric is a useful add-on to a resident's aqueous tube shunt surgery education.

Indexed as

GlaucomaResident educationStepwise educationTube surgery

Identifiers

PMID38404484
PMCPMC10884797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.