Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38404481›Full record

ArticleNature machine intelligence2024

Weak signal extraction enabled by deep neural network denoising of diffraction data.

Jens Oppliger, M Michael Denner, Julia Küspert, Ruggero Frison, Qisi Wang, Alexander Morawietz, Oleh Ivashko, Ann-Christin Dippel, Martin von Zimmermann, Izabela Biało and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature machine intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Jens OppligerPhysik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0712-4343
M Michael DennerPhysik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1762-9687
Julia KüspertPhysik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2905-9992
Ruggero FrisonPhysik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8489-3306
Qisi WangPhysik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8741-7559
Alexander MorawietzPhysik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Oleh IvashkoDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4869-8175
Ann-Christin DippelDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1735-9215
Martin von ZimmermannDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9320-6846
Izabela BiałoPhysik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3431-6102
Leonardo MartinelliPhysik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Benoît FauquéJEIP, USR 3573 CNRS, Collège de France, PSL University, Paris, France.
Jaewon ChoiDiamond Light Source, Didcot, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4616-4345
Mirian Garcia-FernandezDiamond Light Source, Didcot, UK.
Ke-Jin ZhouDiamond Light Source, Didcot, UK.
Niels Bech ChristensenDepartment of Physics, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Tohru KurosawaDepartment of Physics, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Naoki MomonoDepartment of Physics, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Migaku OdaDepartment of Physics, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Fabian D NattererPhysik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Mark H FischerPhysik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0810-6064
Titus NeupertPhysik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Johan ChangPhysik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The removal or cancellation of noise has wide-spread applications in imaging and acoustics. In applications in everyday life, such as image restoration, denoising may even include generative aspects, which are unfaithful to the ground truth. For scientific use, however, denoising must reproduce the ground truth accurately. Denoising scientific data is further challenged by unknown noise profiles. In fact, such data will often include noise from multiple distinct sources, which substantially reduces the applicability of simulation-based approaches. Here we show how scientific data can be denoised by using a deep convolutional neural network such that weak signals appear with quantitative accuracy. In particular, we study X-ray diffraction and resonant X-ray scattering data recorded on crystalline materials. We demonstrate that weak signals stemming from charge ordering, insignificant in the noisy data, become visible and accurate in the denoised data. This success is enabled by supervised training of a deep neural network with pairs of measured low- and high-noise data. We additionally show that using artificial noise does not yield such quantitatively accurate results. Our approach thus illustrates a practical strategy for noise filtering that can be applied to challenging acquisition problems.

Indexed as

Computational scienceCondensed-matter physics

Identifiers

PMID38404481
PMCPMC10883886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.