Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38404458›Full record

ReviewGlobal journal on quality and safety in healthcare2023

Overview of Procurement and Reimbursement of Pharmaceuticals in Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, and Egypt: Challenges and Opportunities.

Anas Hamad, Mai Alsaqa'aby, Yazed Alruthia, Sara Aldallal, Gihan Hamdy Elsisi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anas HamadPharmacy Department, National Center for Cancer Care & Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Mai Alsaqa'abyReal-World Evidence, IQVIA Solutions Limited, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Yazed AlruthiaCollege of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sara AldallalDubai Health Authority, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Gihan Hamdy ElsisiAmerican University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: There is an increased interest in cost consciousness concerning healthcare spending worldwide. In the Arab world, a major transformation is underway in the healthcare sectors to achieve national and government visions to attain better outcomes with optimal value. This article contains expert recommendations on how decision-makers can implement pharmacoeconomic principles at a national level in the Arab world. Methods: A multidisciplinary panel of experts was formed of policymakers, clinical pharmacists, health economists, and chronic disease control and public health experts from different countries and healthcare sectors. The panel developed consensus recommendations for different stakeholders using a framework analysis method. Results: The experts discussed the limitations and opportunities of implementing the pharmacoeconomics concept in evaluating new technologies in their respective countries. Common limitations recognized in the included countries were a lack of infrastructure to support the adoption of the concept in practice, challenges in obtaining data to support the decision-making process, and the lack of human resources to raise awareness among decision-makers and the public to use health economics in making informed decisions in reimbursing new technologies. Conclusion: The expert panel recommendations will guide relevant stakeholders at a national level per country. Adapting these recommendations to each setting is essential to accommodate the situation and needs of each country.

Indexed as

Arab countrieshealthcare policyhealth technology assessment (HTA)pharmacoeconomics

Identifiers

PMID38404458
PMCPMC10887475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.