Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38404360›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative methods

A Content Analysis of 100 Qualitative Health Research Articles to Examine Researcher-Participant Relationships and Implications for Data Sharing.

Jessica Mozersky, Annie B Friedrich, James M DuBois

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative methods. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Exchanging words: Engaging the challenges of sharing qualitative research data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jessica MozerskyBioethics Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Annie B FriedrichBioethics Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6326-751X
James M DuBoisBioethics Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
SHARING QUALITATIVE RESEARCH DATA: IDENTIFYING AND ADDRESSING ETHICAL AND PRACTICAL BARRIERSR01HG009351 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI James M Dubois · 2017 to 2026
$4.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG009351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a qualitative content analysis of health science literature (

Indexed as

data sharinghealth sciencesqualitative researchrelationshipsresearch ethicssecondary analysis

Identifiers

PMID38404360
PMCPMC10888521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.