Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38404335›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2024

Head-mounted adaptive optics visual simulator.

Shoaib R Soomro, Santiago Sager, Alba M Paniagua-Diaz, Pedro M Prieto, Pablo Artal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Shoaib R SoomroVoptica S.L., Campus de Espinardo (Edificio Pleiades), 30100 Murcia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1041-3338
Santiago SagerVoptica S.L., Campus de Espinardo (Edificio Pleiades), 30100 Murcia, Spain.
Alba M Paniagua-DiazLaboratorio de Óptica, Universidad de Murcia, Campus de Espinardo (Edificio 34), 30100 Murcia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1070-2949
Pedro M PrietoLaboratorio de Óptica, Universidad de Murcia, Campus de Espinardo (Edificio 34), 30100 Murcia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6192-4053
Pablo ArtalLaboratorio de Óptica, Universidad de Murcia, Campus de Espinardo (Edificio 34), 30100 Murcia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1284-6591
Universidad de Murcia · ESLittle Priest Tribal College · USMehran University of Engineering and Technology · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptive optics visual simulation is a powerful tool for vision testing and evaluation. However, the existing instruments either have fixed tabletop configurations or, being wearable, only offer the correction of defocus. This paper proposes a novel head-mounted adaptive optics visual simulator that can measure and modify complex ocular aberrations in real-time. The prototype is composed of two optical modules, one for the objective assessment of aberrations and the second for wavefront modulation, all of which are integrated into a wearable headset. The device incorporates a microdisplay for stimulus generation, a liquid crystal on silicon (LCoS) spatial light modulator for wavefront manipulation, and a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor. Miniature optical components and optical path folding structures, together with in-house 3D printed mounts and housing, were adapted to realize the compact size. The system was calibrated by characterizing and compensating the internal aberrations of the visual relay. The performance of the prototype was analyzed by evaluating the measurement and compensation of low-order and higher-order aberrations induced through trial lenses and phase masks in an artificial eye. The defocus curves for a simulated bifocal diffractive lens were evaluated in real eyes. The results show high accuracy while measuring and compensating for the induced defocus, astigmatism, and higher-order aberrations, whereas the MTF analysis shows post-correction resolution of up to 37.5 cycles/degree (VA 1.25). Moreover, the subjective test results show the defocus curves closely matched to a commercial desktop visual simulator.

Identifiers

PMID38404335
PMCPMC10890873
OpenAlexW4390270402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.