ArticleBiomedical optics express2024
Automatic montaging of adaptive optics SLO retinal images based on graph theory.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated montaging and contrast stretching of adaptive optics ophthalmoscope images.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Automatic montaging of adaptive optics SLO retinal images based on graph theory.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present a fully automatic montage pipeline for adaptive optics SLO retinal images. It contains a flexible module to estimate the translation between pairwise images. The user can change modules to accommodate the alignment of the dataset using the most appropriate alignment technique, provided that it estimates the translation between image pairs and provides a quantitative confidence metric for the match between 0 and 1. We use these pairwise comparisons and associated metrics to construct a graph where nodes represent frames and edges represent the overlap relations. We use a small diameter spanning tree to determine the best pairwise alignment for each image based on the entire set of image relations. The final stage of the pipeline is a blending module that uses dynamic programming to improve the smoothness of the transition between frames. Data sets ranging from 26 to 119 images were obtained from individuals aged 24 to 81 years with a mix of visually normal control eyes and eyes with glaucoma or diabetes. The resulting automatically generated montages were qualitatively and quantitatively compared to results from semi-automated alignment. Data sets were specifically chosen to include both high quality and medium quality data. The results obtained from the automatic method are comparable or better than results obtained by an experienced operator performing semi-automated montaging. For the plug-in pairwise alignment module, we tested a technique that utilizes SIFT + RANSAC, Normalized cross-correlation (NCC) and a combination of the two. This pipeline produces consistent results not only on outer retinal layers, but also on inner retinal layers such as a nerve fiber layer or images of the vascular complexes, even when images are not of excellent quality.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.