ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment
The Value of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics in the Evaluation of Interstitial Fibers of Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Role of DECT-Based Imaging Biomarkers and Machine Learning to Predict Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2025Article
- The diagnosis value of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) multi-parameter imaging in lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe investigated the potential of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) radiomics in assessing cancer-associated fibroblasts in clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC).
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 132 patients with ccRCC. The arterial and venous phase iodine-based material decomposition images (IMDIs), virtual non-contrast images, 70 keV, 100 keV, and 150 keV virtual monoenergetic images, and mixed energy images (MEIs) were obtained from the DECT datasets. On the Radcloud platform, radiomics feature extraction, feature selection, and model establishment were performed. Seven radiomics models were established using the support vector machine. The predictive performance was evaluated by utilizing receiver operating characteristic and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Nomograms were constructed.
resultsThe combined model demonstrated high efficiency in evaluating pseudocapsule thickness with AUC, specificity, and sensitivity of 0.833, 0.870, and 0.750, respectively in the validation set, surpassing those of other models. The precision, F1-score, and Youden index were also higher for the combined model. For evaluating the number of collagen fibers, the combined model exhibited the highest AUC (0.741) among all models, with a specificity of 0.830 and a sensitivity of 0.330. The AUC in the 150 kv model and IMDI model were slightly lower than those in the combined model (0.728 and 0.710, respectively), with corresponding sensitivity and specificity of 0.560/0.780 and 0.670/0.830. The nomogram exhibited that Rad-score had good prediction efficiency.
conclusionDECT radiomics features have significant value in evaluating the interstitial fibers of ccRCC. The combined model of IMDI + MEI exhibits superior performance in assessing the thickness of the pseudocapsule, while the combined, 150 keV, and IMDI models demonstrate higher efficacy in evaluating collagen fiber number. Radiomics, combined with imaging features and clinical features, has excellent predictive performance. These findings offer crucial support for the clinical diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of ccRCC and provide valuable insights into the application of DECT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.