Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38403781›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2024

Frontal and cerebellar contributions to pitch and rhythm processing: a TMS study.

Silvia Picazio, Barbara Magnani, Giacomo Koch, Massimiliano Oliveri, Laura Petrosini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Silvia PicazioSanta Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy. s.picazio@hsantalucia.it.
Barbara MagnaniDepartment of Humanities, Social Sciences and Cultural Industries, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Giacomo KochSanta Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Massimiliano OliveriDepartment of Psychology, Educational Sciences and Human Movement, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Laura PetrosiniSanta Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITFondazione Santa Lucia · ITUniversity of Palermo · ITUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Music represents a salient stimulus for the brain with two key features: pitch and rhythm. Few data are available on cognitive analysis of music listening in musically naïve healthy participants. Beyond auditory cortices, neuroimaging data showed the involvement of prefrontal cortex in pitch and of cerebellum in rhythm. The present study is aimed at investigating the role of prefrontal and cerebellar cortices in both pitch and rhythm processing. The performance of fifteen participants without musical expertise was investigated in a listening discrimination task. The task required to decide whether two eight-element melodic sequences were equal or different according to pitch or rhythm characteristics. Before the task, we applied a protocol of continuous theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation interfering with the activity of the left cerebellar hemisphere (lCb), right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG), or vertex (Cz-control site), in a within cross-over design. Our results showed that participants were more accurate in pitch than rhythm tasks. Importantly, the reaction times were slower following rIFG or lCb stimulations in both tasks. Notably, frontal and cerebellar stimulations did not induce any motor effect in right and left hand. The present findings point to the role of the fronto-cerebellar network in music processing with a single mechanism for both pitch and rhythm patterns.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexMusicBrainBrain MappingCerebellumHumansTranscranial Magnetic StimulationCerebellumcTBSMusically naïve individualsMusic listeningPrefrontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID38403781
OpenAlexW4392140900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.