Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38403718›Full record

ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2024

Clinical Significance of Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in Older Patients Over 80.

Daina Kashiwazaki, Emiko Hori, Naoki Akioka, Kunitaka Maruyama, Shusuke Yamamoto, Naoya Kuwayama, Kyo Noguchi, Satoshi Kuroda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daina KashiwazakiDepartments of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama.
Emiko HoriDepartments of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama.
Naoki AkiokaDepartments of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama.
Kunitaka MaruyamaDepartments of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama.
Shusuke YamamotoDepartments of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama.
Naoya KuwayamaDepartments of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama.
Kyo NoguchiDepartments of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama.
Satoshi KurodaDepartments of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama.
University of Toyama · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the average life expectancy increases, neurosurgeons are likely to encounter patients aged 80 years and above with carotid stenosis; however, whether old age affects clinical post-treatment outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains inconclusive. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the outcomes following CEA or CAS in patients aged 80 years and above. This study included older over 80 years (n = 34) and younger patients (<80 years; n = 222) who underwent CEA or CAS between 2012 and 2022. All of them were followed up for a mean of 55 months. All-cause mortality, the incidence of vascular events, ability to perform daily activities, and nursing home admission rates were assessed. During follow-up periods, 34 patients (13.3%) died due to coronary artery disease, malignancy, and pneumonia, and the incidence was significantly higher in the elderly group than in the younger group (P = 0.03; HR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.53-5.56). The incidence of vascular events did not differ between the older group (29.5%) and the younger group (26.9%, P = 0.58); however, the incidence was significantly higher in patients with high-intensity plaques than in those without that (P = 0.008; HR, 2.83, 95%CI, 1.27-4.87). The decline in the ability to perform daily activities and increased nursing home admission rates were high in elderly patients (P < 0.01). Although the mortality rate was higher in the elderly group, subsequent vascular events were comparable to that in the younger group. The results suggest that CEA and CAS are safe and useful treatments for carotid stenosis in older patients, especially to prevent ipsilateral ischemic stroke.

Indexed as

Carotid StenosisEndarterectomy, CarotidStrokeAgedCarotid ArteriesClinical RelevanceHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsStentsTreatment Outcomecarotid artery stentingcarotid endarterectomycarotid stenosislong-term follow-upolder patients

Identifiers

PMID38403718
PMCPMC11099164
OpenAlexW4392148354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.