Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38403673›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Automated neonatal nnU-Net brain MRI extractor trained on a large multi-institutional dataset.

Joshua V Chen, Yi Li, Felicia Tang, Gunvant Chaudhari, Christopher Lew, Amanda Lee, Andreas M Rauschecker, Aden P Haskell-Mendoza, Yvonne W Wu, Evan Calabrese

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
17.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua V ChenDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Yi LiDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Felicia TangDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Gunvant ChaudhariDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Christopher LewDivision of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Amanda LeeDivision of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Andreas M RauscheckerDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Aden P Haskell-MendozaDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Yvonne W WuUniversity of California San Francisco Weill Institute for Neurosciences, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Evan CalabreseDivision of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. evan.calabrese@duke.edu.
University of California, San Francisco · USDuke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain extraction, or skull-stripping, is an essential data preprocessing step for machine learning approaches to brain MRI analysis. Currently, there are limited extraction algorithms for the neonatal brain. We aim to adapt an established deep learning algorithm for the automatic segmentation of neonatal brains from MRI, trained on a large multi-institutional dataset for improved generalizability across image acquisition parameters. Our model, ANUBEX (automated neonatal nnU-Net brain MRI extractor), was designed using nnU-Net and was trained on a subset of participants (N = 433) enrolled in the High-dose Erythropoietin for Asphyxia and Encephalopathy (HEAL) study. We compared the performance of our model to five publicly available models (BET, BSE, CABINET, iBEATv2, ROBEX) across conventional and machine learning methods, tested on two public datasets (NIH and dHCP). We found that our model had a significantly higher Dice score on the aggregate of both data sets and comparable or significantly higher Dice scores on the NIH (low-resolution) and dHCP (high-resolution) datasets independently. ANUBEX performs similarly when trained on sequence-agnostic or motion-degraded MRI, but slightly worse on preterm brains. In conclusion, we created an automatic deep learning-based neonatal brain extraction algorithm that demonstrates accurate performance with both high- and low-resolution MRIs with fast computation time.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingBrainHeadHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedInfant, NewbornMulticenter Studies as TopicSkull

Identifiers

PMID38403673
PMCPMC10894871
OpenAlexW4392148007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.