Observational studyScientific reports2024
Magnet ingestion in growing children: a multi-center observational study on single and multiple magnet incidents.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical characteristics and therapeutic experiences of magnetic foreign body ingestion in children: a single-center retrospective study.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Multiple Magnet Ingestion in a Child With an Overlooked Diagnosis Leading to Intestinal Perforation.Cureus · 2026Article
- Is surgery always necessary for multiple magnet ingestion in children?-evidence for an endoscopy-first approach.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Combined Laparoscopic and Colonoscopic Retrieval of Multiple Ingested Magnetic Beads Without Enterotomy in Children: A Case Report and Literature Review.Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic Removal of Multiple Ingested Magnets Using the Appendix and Meckel's Diverticulum: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- Enteroenteric Fistula Following Multiple Magnet Ingestion in an Adult: Case Report, Literature Review and Management Algorithm.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Endoscopic removal of high-powered magnets from the appendiceal orifice in an asymptomatic child.JPGN reports · 2025Article
- Fishbone ingestion is a non-negligible cause of intestinal perforation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- "Signet Ring Sign" on Plain X-ray Indicates the Need for Surgical Intervention After Magnet Ingestion in Children.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past 15 years, there has been a noticeable uptick in incidents involving children ingesting multiple magnetic foreign bodies which can cause injuries and gastrointestinal complications including death. The current study aimed to identify the prevalence, clinical presentation, and management of single or multiple magnet ingestions. A retrospective multi-central cross-sectional study was conducted to include all pediatric patients < 18 years presented to the emergency department with ingestion of single or multiple magnets and admitted across hospitals in Qatar, UAE, KSA, Tunisia, and Turkey between January 2011 and December 2021. Demographics, symptoms, management, and outcomes were analyzed. There were 189 magnet ingestions, of which 88 (46.6%) were multiple magnet ingestions. Most patients (55.6%) were male, and the median age was 3.9 (IQR 2-7) years. An abdominal X-ray was obtained in all cases. 119 (62%) patients were conservatively treated, 53 (28%) required surgical intervention and 17 (8.9%) underwent gastroscopy. None of the patients with single magnet ingestions experienced morbidity or severe outcomes. Multiple magnet ingestions led to significant morbidity including hospitalizations, perforations (44.3%), severe intestinal necrosis (19.3%), peritonitis (13.6%), severe abdominal infection (10.2%), and septic shock (4.5%). The rate of surgical intervention (59.1% vs. 1.0%) and gastroscopy (15.9% vs. 3.0%) was significantly higher in the multiple ingestion group compared to the single magnet ingestion group. No deaths were identified. A high risk of serious complications, including the need for surgery to remove the magnets and substantial morbidity may result from swallowing more than one magnet. Magnet safety requirements, public education, and improved legislation are urgently required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.