Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38403280›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2024

Non-alcoholic beverage consumption among US adults who consume alcohol.

Molly A Bowdring, Denis M McCarthy, Catharine E Fairbairn, Judith J Prochaska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. 'Zero-alcohol' products and the guise of responsibility.Journal of public health policy · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Perinatal use of nonalcoholic beverages that mirror alcohol.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Non-alcoholic beer labeling in the United States.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Molly A BowdringStanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5115-274X
Denis M McCarthyDepartment of Psychology, University of Missouri, 210 McAlester Hall, Columbia, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5799-8057
Catharine E FairbairnDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 603 East Daniel Street, Champaign, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2694-5585
Judith J ProchaskaStanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7925-326X

Funding

Cardiovascular and Chronic Disease Prevention Training ProgramT32HL161270 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHRISTOPHER D GARDNER · 2022 to 2026
$2.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS 5T32HL161270-02NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL161270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsNon-alcoholic beverages (NABs) that mimic alcohol without inducing intoxication, such as non-alcoholic beers, non-alcoholic wines and spirit-free drinks, are increasing in popularity. It is unknown whether NABs help to mitigate or stimulate alcohol use. The present study aimed to describe NAB consumption practices among US adults consuming alcohol, characterize who is likely to consume NABs and examine whether NAB use influences desire for and perceived consumption of alcohol. DESIGN AND

participantsThe survey study used data collected June-July 2023 from an on-line convenience sample. The first survey (n = 1906) assessed frequency of NAB consumption among US adults who consume alcohol. A second more detailed survey on use patterns was conducted with 466 respondents who reported past-year NAB consumption, of whom 153 (32.83%) screened positive on the CAGE questionnaire for alcohol use disorder (AUD).

settingThis study took place in the United States. MEASUREMENTS: NAB consumption measures included type of NAB consumed, frequency, quantity, first consumption age, consumption reasons, consumption contexts and perceived effect on desire for and consumption of alcohol. Alcohol use measures included frequency, quantity and first consumption age.

findingsPast-year NAB use was endorsed by 28.44% of respondents (61.70% ever used). Non-alcoholic liquor/'mocktails' were the most common NAB type consumed (83.69%). Compared with respondents without AUD, those who screened positive for AUD were significantly more likely to consume NABs in an effort to decrease or abstain from drinking alcohol [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 3.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.24-5.58] and 67.97% endorsed less alcohol consumption (3.23% endorsed more) due to their NAB use. NAB consumption frequency and quantity were significantly positively predicted by alcohol consumption frequency (AOR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.17-1.83) and quantity (β = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.15-0.35), respectively.

conclusionAdults who consume alcohol and screen positive for alcohol use disorder report drinking non-alcoholic beverages as a harm reduction strategy.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAdolescentAdultAgedBeveragesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesWineYoung AdultAlcohol‐freedry Januaryharm reductionNA drinkssober curiosityzero alcohol

Identifiers

PMID38403280
PMCPMC12175001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.