ArticleChest2024
Noninvasive Electromagnetic Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in Critically Ill Patients: A Feasibility Study.
Article in Chest, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05238753 (Electromagnetic Stimulation of the Phrenic Nerve to Generate Contraction of the Diaphragm in Critically Ill Mechanically Ventilated Patients - a Proof-of-concept Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Electromagnetic Stimulation of the Phrenic Nerve to Generate Contraction of the Diaphragm in Critically Ill Mechanically Ventilated Patients - a Proof-of-concept Study (STIMIT-II)
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The contribution of mechanical ventilation to critical illness-associated diaphragm dysfunction: a critical appraisal.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- The diaphragm-intercostal index for predicting weaning failure in mechanically ventilated patients: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- High PEEP Activates ITGB1, Inducing Diaphragm Fibrosis During Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- Article
- Diaphragm Pacing in Early Critical Illness? A Plea for a Super-Relaxed Approach.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025Article
- Effects of external diaphragm pacing combined with repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerve on respiratory function in stroke patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElectromagnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerve induces diaphragm contractions, but no coils for clinical use have been available. We recently demonstrated the feasibility of ventilation using bilateral transcutaneous noninvasive electromagnetic phrenic nerve stimulation (NEPNS) before surgery in lung-healthy patients with healthy weight in a dose-dependent manner. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is NEPNS feasible in critically ill patients in an ICU setting? STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsThis feasibility nonrandomized controlled study aimed to enroll patients within 36 h of intubation who were expected to remain ventilated for ≥ 72 h. The intervention group received 15-min bilateral transcutaneous NEPNS bid, whereas the control group received standard care. If sufficient, NEPNS was used without pressure support to ventilate the patient; pressure support was added if necessary to ventilate the patient adequately. The primary outcome was feasibility, measured as time to find the optimal stimulation position. Further end points were sessions performed according to the protocol or allowing a next-day catch-up session and tidal volume achieved with stimulation reaching only 3 to 6 mL/kg ideal body weight (IBW). A secondary end point was expiratory diaphragm thickness measured with ultrasound from days 1 to 10 (or extubation).
resultsThe revised European Union regulation mandated reapproval of medical devices, prematurely halting the study. Eleven patients (five in the intervention group, six in the control group) were enrolled. The median time to find an adequate stimulation position was 23 s (interquartile range, 12-62 s). The intervention bid was executed in 87% of patients, and 92% of patients including a next-day catch-up session. Ventilation with 3 to 6 mL/kg IBW was achieved in 732 of 1,701 stimulations (43.0%) with stimulation only and in 2,511 of 4,036 stimulations (62.2%) with additional pressure support. A decrease in diaphragm thickness was prevented by bilateral NEPNS (P = .034) until day 10.
interpretationBilateral transcutaneous NEPNS was feasible in the ICU setting with the potential benefit of preventing diaphragm atrophy during mechanical ventilation. NEPNS ventilation effectiveness needs further assessment. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT05238753; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.