Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38403186›Full record

ArticleChest2024

Noninvasive Electromagnetic Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in Critically Ill Patients: A Feasibility Study.

Alessandro Panelli, Aline M Grimm, Sven Krause, Michael A Verfuß, Bernhard Ulm, Julius J Grunow, Hermann G Bartels, Niklas M Carbon, Thomas Niederhauser, Steffen Weber-Carstens and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Chest, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05238753 (Electromagnetic Stimulation of the Phrenic Nerve to Generate Contraction of the Diaphragm in Critically Ill Mechanically Ventilated Patients - a Proof-of-concept Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05238753 naterminatednot on this map

Electromagnetic Stimulation of the Phrenic Nerve to Generate Contraction of the Diaphragm in Critically Ill Mechanically Ventilated Patients - a Proof-of-concept Study (STIMIT-II)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharite University, Berlin, GermanyRan2022 to 2022Enrolled10ConditionsMuscle Weakness, Critical Illness, Mechanical Ventilation ComplicationArmsNon-invasive electromagnetic stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Diaphragm Pacing in Early Critical Illness? A Plea for a Super-Relaxed Approach.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alessandro PanelliCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Berlin, Germany.
Aline M GrimmCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Berlin, Germany.
Sven KrauseInstitute for Human Centered Engineering, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Biel/Bienne, Switzerland.
Michael A VerfußCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Berlin, Germany.
Bernhard UlmTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Munich, Germany; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Julius J GrunowCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Berlin, Germany.
Hermann G BartelsCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Berlin, Germany.
Niklas M CarbonCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Berlin, Germany; Department of Anesthesiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Thomas NiederhauserInstitute for Human Centered Engineering, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Biel/Bienne, Switzerland.
Steffen Weber-CarstensCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Berlin, Germany.
Laurent BrochardKeenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Stefan J SchallerCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Berlin, Germany; Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: stefan.schaller@charite.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectromagnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerve induces diaphragm contractions, but no coils for clinical use have been available. We recently demonstrated the feasibility of ventilation using bilateral transcutaneous noninvasive electromagnetic phrenic nerve stimulation (NEPNS) before surgery in lung-healthy patients with healthy weight in a dose-dependent manner. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is NEPNS feasible in critically ill patients in an ICU setting? STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsThis feasibility nonrandomized controlled study aimed to enroll patients within 36 h of intubation who were expected to remain ventilated for ≥ 72 h. The intervention group received 15-min bilateral transcutaneous NEPNS bid, whereas the control group received standard care. If sufficient, NEPNS was used without pressure support to ventilate the patient; pressure support was added if necessary to ventilate the patient adequately. The primary outcome was feasibility, measured as time to find the optimal stimulation position. Further end points were sessions performed according to the protocol or allowing a next-day catch-up session and tidal volume achieved with stimulation reaching only 3 to 6 mL/kg ideal body weight (IBW). A secondary end point was expiratory diaphragm thickness measured with ultrasound from days 1 to 10 (or extubation).

resultsThe revised European Union regulation mandated reapproval of medical devices, prematurely halting the study. Eleven patients (five in the intervention group, six in the control group) were enrolled. The median time to find an adequate stimulation position was 23 s (interquartile range, 12-62 s). The intervention bid was executed in 87% of patients, and 92% of patients including a next-day catch-up session. Ventilation with 3 to 6 mL/kg IBW was achieved in 732 of 1,701 stimulations (43.0%) with stimulation only and in 2,511 of 4,036 stimulations (62.2%) with additional pressure support. A decrease in diaphragm thickness was prevented by bilateral NEPNS (P = .034) until day 10.

interpretationBilateral transcutaneous NEPNS was feasible in the ICU setting with the potential benefit of preventing diaphragm atrophy during mechanical ventilation. NEPNS ventilation effectiveness needs further assessment. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT05238753; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessDiaphragmFeasibility StudiesPhrenic NerveAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRespiration, ArtificialTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationTreatment Outcomeartificialcritical carecritical illnessICUsinteractive ventilatory supportmagnetic fieldsmagnetic field therapymagnetic stimulation therapymuscular atrophyrespirationventilator weaning

Identifiers

PMID38403186
PMCPMC11443241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.