Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38402595›Full record

ArticleGM crops & food2024

Exploring the GMO narrative through labeling: strategies, products, and politics.

Camille D Ryan, Elizabeth Henggeler, Samantha Gilbert, Andrew J Schaul, John T Swarthout

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GM crops & food, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Current and future uses of genetic improvement technologies in livestock breeding programs.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Camille D RyanStrategic Insights, Bayer Crop Science Canada,Calgary, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6855-5761
Elizabeth HenggelerStrategic Insights, Bayer Crop Science, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Samantha GilbertE-Commerce Search and Catalog Analysis, Millipore Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Andrew J SchaulStrategic Insights, Bayer Crop Science, St. Louis, MO, USA.
John T SwarthoutRegulatory Scientific Affairs, Bayer Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO, USA.
Bayer (United States) · USBayer (Canada) · CASearch · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Labels are influential signals in the marketplace intended to inform and to eliminate buyer confusion. Despite this, food labels continue to be the subject of debate. None more so than non-GMO (genetically modified organisms) labels. This manuscript provides a timeline of the evolution of GMO labels beginning with the early history of the anti-GMO movement to the current National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard in the United States. Using media and market intelligence data collected through Buzzsumo™ and Mintel™, public discourse of GMOs is analyzed in relation to sociopolitical events and the number of new food products with anti-GMO labels, respectively. Policy document and publication data is collected with Overton™ to illustrate the policy landscape for the GMO topic and how it has changed over time. Analysis of the collective data illustrates that while social media and policy engagement around the topic of GMOs has diminished over time, the number of new products with a GMO-free designation continues to grow. While discourse peaked at one point, and has since declined, our results suggest that the legacy of an anti-GMO narrative remains firmly embedded in the social psyche, evidenced by the continuing rise of products with GMO-free designation. Campaigns for GMO food labels to satisfy consumers' right to know were successful and the perceived need for this information now appears to be self-sustaining.

Indexed as

Food, Genetically ModifiedFood LabelingHumansPlants, Genetically ModifiedPoliticsUnited StatesDisinformationgenetically modified organismsGMOslabelingmisinformationpublic perceptionsright to knowsocial media

Identifiers

PMID38402595
PMCPMC10896172
OpenAlexW4392140222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.