ArticleSingapore medical journal2026
Outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrests during and after office hours in a single tertiary centre in Singapore.
Article in Singapore medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- In-hospital cardiac arrest in a Singaporean tertiary hospital: Epidemiology, outcomes, and potential suboptimal end-of-life planning.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026Article
- Disparities in Survival After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest by Time of Day and Day of Week: A Single-Center Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is a significant healthcare burden with a paucity of data in Singapore. Various factors, including time of cardiac arrest, affect survival from acute resuscitation.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study that evaluated the characteristics of patients who sustained an IHCA, including the Cardiac Arrest Survival Post Resuscitation In-hospital (CASPRI) scores, and the impact of arrest time in 220 consecutive cardiac arrests occurring in a tertiary hospital. The primary outcome was rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) post-IHCA, and the secondary outcome was 90-day survival.
resultsThe ROSC rate among patients with IHCA out of and during office hours was 69.5% and 75.4%, respectively (odds ratio [OR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-1.42). There were no statistically significant differences between the CASPRI scores of both groups. After adjusted analysis, the OR of ROSC post-IHCA out of office hours as compared to that during office hours was 0.78 (95% CI 0.39-1.53). The 90-day survival rate of patients who had an IHCA out of and during office hours was 25.7% and 34.6%, respectively (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.32-1.34). The adjusted OR of 90-day survival was 0.66 (0.28-1.59).
conclusionThe results of this observational study did not show an association between the timing of cardiac arrest and the rate of ROSC or 90-day survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.