Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38402566›Full record

ArticleClinical cardiology2024

Predicting the risk of mortality and rehospitalization in heart failure patients: A retrospective cohort study by machine learning approach.

Marzieh Ketabi, Aref Andishgar, Zhila Fereidouni, Maryam Mojarrad Sani, Ashkan Abdollahi, Mohebat Vali, Abdulhakim Alkamel, Reza Tabrizi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Molecular mechanisms and intervention approaches of heart failure (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marzieh KetabiStudent Research Committee, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Aref AndishgarUSERN Office, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Zhila FereidouniDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, Fasa University of Medical Science, Fars, Iran.
Maryam Mojarrad SaniSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ashkan AbdollahiSchool of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohebat ValiStudent Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Abdulhakim AlkamelNoncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Fasa University of Medical Science, Fasa, Iran.
Reza TabriziNoncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Fasa University of Medical Science, Fasa, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7634-3948

Funding

Deputy of Research and Technology of Fasa University of Medical Sciences 401134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeart failure (HF) is a global problem, affecting more than 26 million people worldwide. This study evaluated the performance of 10 machine learning (ML) algorithms and chose the best algorithm to predict mortality and readmission of HF patients by using The Fasa Registry on Systolic HF (FaRSH) database. HYPOTHESIS: ML algorithms may better identify patients at increased risk of HF readmission or death with demographic and clinical data.

methodsThrough comprehensive evaluation, the best-performing model was used for prediction. Finally, all the trained models were applied to the test data, which included 20% of the total data. For the final evaluation and comparison of the models, five metrics were used: accuracy, F1-score, sensitivity, specificity and Area Under Curve (AUC).

resultsTen ML algorithms were evaluated. The CatBoost (CAT) algorithm uses a series of decision tree models to create a nonlinear model, and this CAT algorithm performed the best of the 10 models studied. According to the three final outcomes from this study, which involved 2488 participants, 366 (14.7%) of the patients were readmitted to the hospital, 97 (3.9%) of the patients died within 1 month of the follow-up, and 342 (13.7%) of the patients died within 1 year of the follow-up. The most significant variables to predict the events were length of stay in the hospital, hemoglobin level, and family history of MI.

conclusionsThe ML-based risk stratification tool was able to assess the risk of 5-year all-cause mortality and readmission in patients with HF. ML could provide an explicit explanation of individualized risk prediction and give physicians an intuitive understanding of the influence of critical features in the model.

Indexed as

Heart FailurePatient ReadmissionHumansMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorscohort studiesheart failuremachine learningmortalitypatient readmission

Identifiers

PMID38402566
PMCPMC10894620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.