Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38402509›Full record

ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2024

Remote monitoring of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a low disease activity state: a mixed methods evaluation across six hospitals in London, UK.

Kathryn Watson, Helen Sheldon, Elena Pallari, Nikita Arumalla, Rachel R Olive, Olga Boiko, Camille Aznar, Emma-Jayne Adams, Ailsa Bosworth, Len Demetriou and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kathryn WatsonCentre for Implementation Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4015-3875
Helen SheldonInsights Team, Health Innovation Network, London, UK.
Elena PallariInsights Team, Health Innovation Network, London, UK.
Nikita ArumallaRheumatology Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2797-5372
Rachel R OliveCentre for Implementation Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Olga BoikoCentre for Implementation Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Camille AznarInsights Team, Health Innovation Network, London, UK.
Emma-Jayne AdamsPatient Author.
Ailsa BosworthNational Rheumatoid Arthritis Society, Maidenhead, UK.
Len DemetriouCentre for Implementation Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Melanie MartinRheumatology Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Mary-Ann PalmerPatient Author from Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Polly SinclairInsights Team, Health Innovation Network, London, UK.
Emily J SmithRheumatology Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Nick SevdalisCentre for Implementation Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7560-8924
Andrew WalkerInsights Team, Health Innovation Network, London, UK.
Toby GarroodRheumatology Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBArthritis Society · CANational Patient Safety Foundation · US

Funding

Academic Health Science Network for south LondonApplied Research CollaborationGuy's and St Thomas CharityGuy's and St Thomas' FoundationHealth Innovation NetworkKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation TrustKing's College LondonKing's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustKing's Health PartnersKing's Improvement ScienceNational Institute for Health ResearchNHS Foundation TrustSouth London at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study evaluated the scale-up of a remote monitoring service, capturing monthly Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease scores and patient-generated text messages, for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA; in remission or with low disease activity) attending routine outpatient clinics across six hospitals. We explored patients and staff experiences and implementation outcomes.

methodsA pragmatic, mixed methods approach was used, with active patient involvement throughout. We undertook a rapid review, analysed service-level data, and conducted a patient survey and patient and staff interviews, informed by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour (COM-B) and Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) theoretical frameworks.

resultsThe review included 37 articles, covering themes of patient and clinician acceptability, engagement, feasibility and clinical impact. Service-level data (n = 202) showed high levels of patient engagement with the service. The patient survey (n = 155) showed patients felt the service was easy to use, had confidence in it and felt it improved access to care. Patient interview (n = 22) findings mirrored those of the survey. Motivating factors included increased responsiveness and ease of contact with clinical teams. Views from staff interviews (n = 16) were more mixed. Some implementation barriers were specific to roll-out sites. Prioritization of staff needs was emphasized.

conclusionPatients were positive about the service and engagement was high. Staff views and engagement were more mixed. Results suggest that equal levels of patient and staff engagement are required for sustainability. These findings further our understanding of the implementation challenges to scaling remote monitoring interventions for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in routine care settings.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansLondonMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationPatient SatisfactionSeverity of Illness IndexTelemedicineText Messagingimplementationremote monitoringrheumatoid arthritisservice evaluation

Identifiers

PMID38402509
PMCPMC11443016
OpenAlexW4392143563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.