Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38402506›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2024

A framework for building comprehensive cancer center's capacity for bidirectional engagement.

Erika S Trapl, Sarah Koopman Gonzalez, Kristina Austin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fostering Student Engagement via a Community Outreach and Engagement Internship Program.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  2. Acceptability and Preliminary Impact of a Cancer-Focused Communication and Community Engagement Training Program for Investigators.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erika S TraplDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. Erika.Trapl@case.edu.
Sarah Koopman GonzalezDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Kristina AustinCase Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Case Western Reserve University · US

Funding

TUMOR METABOLISM PROGRAMP30CA043703 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK R CHANCE · 1987 to 2026
$142.3M
NCI NIH HHS 3P30CA043703-30S3NCI NIH HHS P30 CA043703NIH HHS P30CA043703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCommunity engagement has benefits for cancer centers' work and for its researchers. This study examined the experiences and perceptions of community engagement by members of the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center (Case CCC) to create and implement a framework to meet the needs of the entire cancer center.

methodsThis study included three phases: 1) Semi-structured interviews with 12 researchers from a basic science program to identify needs and suggestions for the support of community engagement; 2) Preliminary interview results informed the development of a survey of 86 cancer center members' about their awareness of and readiness to integrate community outreach and engagement into their research; and 3) The Case CCC Office of Community Outreach and Engagement reviewed the results from phases 1 and 2 to develop and then utilize a framework of engagement opportunities.

resultsIn the interviews and surveys, cancer center members recognized the importance of community engagement and expressed an interest in participating in COE-organized opportunities for bidirectional engagement. While participation barriers include communication issues, limited awareness of opportunities, and competing priorities, members were open to learning new skills, changing approaches, and utilizing services to facilitate engagement. The framework outlines engagement opportunities ranging from high touch, low reach to low touch, and high reach and was used to develop specific services.

conclusionThis study identified varying needs around community engagement using an approach aimed at understanding the perspectives of a community of scientists. Implementing the framework enables reaching scientists in different ways and facilitates scientists' recognition of and engagement with opportunities.

Indexed as

Cancer Care FacilitiesCapacity BuildingCommunity-Institutional RelationsCommunity ParticipationHumansNeoplasmsSurveys and QuestionnairesCancer centerCommunity engagementFrameworksMixed methods

Identifiers

PMID38402506
PMCPMC11130016
OpenAlexW4392144181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.