ArticleClinical and experimental nephrology2024
Preference for anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibody assay in patients with suspected membranous nephropathy: a survey study on medical practice after publication of Japanese Guidelines for Nephrotic Syndrome 2020.
Article in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical epidemiology for comprehensive kidney care: a framework for developing clinical research questions, from biomarkers to patient-reported outcomes.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInternational practice guidelines advocate for the use of anti-phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) antibody testing to diagnose primary membranous nephropathy (pMN). This study aimed to clarify the current status of anti-PLA2R antibody testing in the diagnosis of pMN in Japan and to scrutinize the factors associated with the implementation of this antibody test.
methodsUtilizing a web-based questionnaire for nephrologists, responses were collected from 306 facilities and 427 nephrologists between November 2021 and December 2021. Preference for anti-PLA2R antibody testing was also investigated. Factors related to the experience of quantifying anti-PLA2R antibodies were estimated by generalized estimating equations using a robust analysis of variance with clusters of facilities of affiliation.
resultsOf the 427 respondents, 140 (32.8%) had previous measurement experience at their current workplace and 165 (38.6%) had previous measurement experience overall. In pMN-suspected cases without contraindications to renal biopsy, 147 (34.4%) of the respondents opted to request anti-PLA2R antibody testing. The respondents' experience with anti-PLA2R antibody quantification at their current place of work was generally higher in university hospitals and increased with the annual number of kidney biopsies and the number of years since graduation.
conclusionThe results of this study suggest that a significant proportion of nephrologists in Japan have no experience in performing anti-PLA2R antibody assays, and that the assays may be hampered by the limited capabilities of the current workplace and the financial burden on facilities and patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.