ArticleAdvances in therapy2024
Comparative Efficacy of Talquetamab vs. Current Treatments in the LocoMMotion and MoMMent Studies in Patients with Triple-Class-Exposed Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
64407564MMY1001: A Phase 1/2, First-in-Human, Open-Label, Dose Escalation Study of Talquetamab, a Humanized GPRC5D x CD3 Bispecific Antibody, in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
A Prospective, Multinational Study of Real-life Current Standards of Care in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Who Received at Least 3 Prior Lines of Therapy Including PI, IMID, and CD38 Monoclonal Antibody Treatment
A Phase 1/2, First-in-Human, Open-Label, Dose Escalation Study of Talquetamab, a Humanized GPRC5D x CD3 Bispecific Antibody, in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
A Prospective, Multinational Study of Real-Life Current Standards of Care in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- T-Cell Engagers TargetingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of linvoseltamab versus real-world standard-of-care in triple-class-exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the United States.Blood cancer journal · 2026Trial
- Linvoseltamab versus real-world International Myeloma Working Group standard-of-care in triple-class exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.Blood cancer journal · 2026Trial
- Plitidepsin in combination with dexamethasone (ADMYRE trial) versus an external control arm of pomalidomide plus dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.Annals of hematology · 2026Trial
- Astaxanthin (AstaRealAdvances in therapy · 2025Trial
- Functional immune profiling translates T cell dynamics into predictive biomarkers for myeloma immunotherapy.Leukemia · 2026Article
- Review
- Inhibition of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 Signaling by Ponatinib Reduces Growth and Cytokine Production of Multiple Myeloma Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Talquetamab in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the MonumenTAL-1 study.International journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Comparative Efficacy of Talquetamab vs. Real-World Physician's Choice of Treatment in Triple-Class-Exposed Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated Analyses of MonumenTAL-1 vs. LocoMMotion/MoMMent.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Emerging precision medicine in multiple myeloma: clinical and preclinical landscape of T cell, natural killer cell, and macrophages engaging multi-specific antibodies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Polypharmacology: new drugs in 2023-2024.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2025Review
- Review
- Talquetamab in Multiple Myeloma: Efficacy, Safety, and Future Directions.European journal of haematology · 2025Review
- Application of GPRC5D Targeting Therapy in Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- Plasma Cell Neoplasms with Spreading in the Blood and Tissues: Extramedullary Myeloma Disease, a Rare Aggressive Form of Multiple Myeloma (First of Two Parts).Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2025Review
- Impact of immunological aging on T cell-mediated therapies in older adults with multiple myeloma and lymphoma.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2024Review
- Mechanism of Action and Pharmacokinetics of Approved Bispecific Antibodies.Biomolecules & therapeutics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors at 18 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTalquetamab, a bispecific antibody targeting GPRC5D × CD3, is approved for the treatment of patients with triple-class -exposed (TCE) relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) on the basis of the results from the phase I/II MonumenTAL-1 trial. The relative effectiveness of talquetamab vs. real-world physician's choice of therapy (RWPC) was assessed using adjusted comparisons.
methodsAn external control arm for MonumenTAL-1 (subcutaneously administered talquetamab 0.4 mg/kg weekly [QW] and 0.8 mg/kg every other week [Q2W]) was created from two observational real-world studies: LocoMMotion and MoMMent. Imbalances in baseline covariates were adjusted using inverse probability weighting. The relative effectiveness of talquetamab vs. RWPC was estimated for overall response rate (ORR), ≥ very good partial response (VGPR), and ≥ complete response (CR); odds ratios and relative response ratios (RRs) were derived from weighted logistic regression. Hazard ratios (HRs) for duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using a weighted Cox proportional hazards model.
resultsAfter reweighting, baseline characteristics were balanced across cohorts. In adjusted comparisons, patients treated with talquetamab QW (n = 143) had significantly improved outcomes vs. RWPC; RRs were ORR 2.67, p < 0.0001; ≥ VGPR 4.70, p < 0.0001; ≥ CR 78.05, p = 0.0002; and HRs were PFS 0.52, p < 0.0001; TTNT 0.48, p < 0.0001; OS 0.36, p < 0.0001. Patients treated with talquetamab Q2W (n = 145) also had significantly improved outcomes vs. RWPC; RRs were ORR 2.62, p < 0.0001; ≥ VGPR 5.04, p < 0.0001; ≥ CR 101.14, p = 0.0002; and HRs were PFS 0.40, p < 0.0001; TTNT 0.39, p < 0.0001; OS 0.37, p < 0.0001.
conclusionEffectiveness of talquetamab for both schedules was significantly better than RWPC for ORR, ≥ VGPR, ≥ CR, PFS, OS, and TTNT, highlighting its clinical benefit for patients with TCE RRMM.
trial registrationMonumenTAL-1, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03399799/NCT04634552; LocoMMotion, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04035226; MoMMent, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05160584.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.